Ultraviolet C radiation influences the robustness of RNA integrity measurement

Abstract

The analytical and clinical validity of analyses of RNA samples destined for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic management is directly impacted by RNA quality. RNA is affected by heat, enzymatic degradation, and Ultraviolet (UV) light. RNA from three eukaryotic cell lines was degraded by heat, RNase, or UV light. RNA integrity values obtained with the benchmark Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system were compared with those from the more recent QIAxcel Advanced system. The application of this novel method has allowed us to unravel differences between RNA biophysical and biochemical degradation modes. Agilent RNA integrity number (RIN) and QIAxcel RIS were comparable in heat-degraded and RNase III-degraded RNA. Agilent RIN and QIAxcel RIS were comparable at a RIN decision level of 7 in UV-degraded RNA but not overall. The QIAxcel RIS method was more precise than Agilent RIN for RIN<8, while the inverse was true for RIN≥8. Greater degradation of mRNA and rRNA in UV-damaged samples hampered the Agilent RIN calculation algorithm. Overall, RIS was more robust than RIN for assessing RNA integrity. The ΔΔCt-values for heat- and UV-degraded RNA samples showed slightly higher correlation with RIS than with RIN. RNA integrity can be used to categorize RNA samples for suitability for downstream gene expression analyses, independently of the RNA degradation mechanism. The new method QIAxcel is more robust and therefore allows more accurate categorization of compromised RNA samples.

A Biospecimen Proficiency Testing Program for Biobank Accreditation: Four Years of Experience

“…A comparison between the Agilent and Qiaxcel technologies has shown that Qiaxcel is more precise for certain types of RNA samples. 20 All four annual PT programs showed that the Agilent Bioanalyzer is associated with random errors, especially between RINs 4 and 7.…”

The Paraffin-Embedded RNA Metric (PERM) for RNA Isolated from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

“…In addition, Unger et al recently demonstrated that the precision of the RIN as an RNA QC test depends on the biochemical or biophysical RNA degradation method used, such as heat, enzymatic, or UV light. Recently, RIS (13) and DV 200 (Illumina Technical Note, Pub. No 470-2013-002) metrics were described in the latest versions of analysis software using QIAxcel Screen Gel software (Ver.…”

“…Furthermore, this methodology is unsuitable for highly degraded RNA from FFPE tissues. To overcome these problems, several publications have discussed RNA quality control (QC) tools, for example the RIN (2,3), RNA integrity score (RIS) (13), DV 200 (2014. Expression Analysis of FFPE Samples.…”

Instability of circular RNAs in clinical tissue samples impairs their reliable expression analysis using RT-qPCR: from the myth of their advantage as biomarkers to reality

“…This approach has been applied in other studies 19 , 55 . Comparative studies on different artificial degradative processes for total RNA have shown that thermal degradation changes RNA integrity in a manner that mimics that of degradation by ubiquitous RNases 49 , 52 , 56 .…”