Ultraviolet A Radiation (320–400 nm) Protects Hairless Mice from Immunosuppression Induced by Ultraviolet B Radiation (280–320 nm) or <i>Cis-</i>Urocanic Acid
Abstract:T cell-mediated immune function, here measured as the contact hypersensitivity reaction, is readily suppressed by moderate exposure of mice to ultraviolet B (UVB) or solar-simulated radiation (SSUV), or by topical application of cis-urocanic acid. The effect of ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation on immune function has been unclear. Here we have demonstrated that when UVA radiation from a fluorescent tube source was rigorously filtered to remove contaminating UVB radiation, it was immunologically innocuous at phys… Show more
“…We have speculated that the mechanism of UVA photoimmunoprotection involves a UVA photoproduct that is relatively stable and persists for at least 24 h in the cutaneous environment, perhaps localized in the dermis where it would be preferentially produced by UVA rather than UVB radiation (10). This study has tested the hypothesis that induced HO-1 acts in this role and has shown that, whereas there is measurable HO enzyme activity present constitutively in hairless mouse skin, cutaneous HO activity is also UVA inducible and remains elevated for a period of at least 3 d after UVA irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, exposure to such UVA radiation induced a state of resistance in the mice to the immunosuppressive effects of either UVB radiation or cis-UCA (10), both of which could be applied before, immediately after, or up to 24 h after the UVA radiation. We postulated that UVA exposure may induce a relatively long-lived, but as-yet-unidentified, immunoprotective photoproduct that can inhibit the activity of cis-UCA and thus provide protection from UVB-induced photoimmunosuppression.…”
In contrast to the immunosuppressive potential of UVB (280-320 nm) radiation in experimental animals and humans, UVA (320-400 nm) radiation at environmentally relevant doses appears to be immunologically inert. However, such exposure to UVA radiation has been observed unexpectedly to induce resistance to UVB-induced immunosuppression in mice, by a mechanism resulting in the inactivation of cis-urocanic acid (UCA), an epidermal immunosuppressive UV photoproduct. In this study in mice, we show that the immunoprotective activity of UVA radiation, against the effects of both UVB radiation and cis-UCA, can be attributed to the induction of cutaneous heme oxygenase (HO; EC 1.14.99.3). Cell-mediated immune function was assessed in vivo by the contact hypersensitivity response induced to oxazolone at an unirradiated skin site, and HO enzyme activity was measured in cutaneous microsomal preparations from treated mice. There was a progressive increase in HO enzyme activity for at least 3 days after UVA irradiation. However HO activity, both constitutive and UVA radiation-induced, was sensitive to the effects of injecting mice with the specific HO inhibitor, tin protoporphyrin (Sn [IV] protoporphyrin IX; SnPP). We observed, in addition, that in SnPP-injected mice, the immunoprotective effect of UVA radiation against either UVB radiation or cis-UCA was abrogated. Because SnPP injection did not affect normal contact hypersensitivity responsiveness but did inhibit the constitutive HO enzyme activity, it appeared that only the inducible HO was active in modulating immune function. This finding indicates that UVA-induced HO activity is a major player in the skin defenses against UVB immunosuppression.
“…We have speculated that the mechanism of UVA photoimmunoprotection involves a UVA photoproduct that is relatively stable and persists for at least 24 h in the cutaneous environment, perhaps localized in the dermis where it would be preferentially produced by UVA rather than UVB radiation (10). This study has tested the hypothesis that induced HO-1 acts in this role and has shown that, whereas there is measurable HO enzyme activity present constitutively in hairless mouse skin, cutaneous HO activity is also UVA inducible and remains elevated for a period of at least 3 d after UVA irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, exposure to such UVA radiation induced a state of resistance in the mice to the immunosuppressive effects of either UVB radiation or cis-UCA (10), both of which could be applied before, immediately after, or up to 24 h after the UVA radiation. We postulated that UVA exposure may induce a relatively long-lived, but as-yet-unidentified, immunoprotective photoproduct that can inhibit the activity of cis-UCA and thus provide protection from UVB-induced photoimmunosuppression.…”
In contrast to the immunosuppressive potential of UVB (280-320 nm) radiation in experimental animals and humans, UVA (320-400 nm) radiation at environmentally relevant doses appears to be immunologically inert. However, such exposure to UVA radiation has been observed unexpectedly to induce resistance to UVB-induced immunosuppression in mice, by a mechanism resulting in the inactivation of cis-urocanic acid (UCA), an epidermal immunosuppressive UV photoproduct. In this study in mice, we show that the immunoprotective activity of UVA radiation, against the effects of both UVB radiation and cis-UCA, can be attributed to the induction of cutaneous heme oxygenase (HO; EC 1.14.99.3). Cell-mediated immune function was assessed in vivo by the contact hypersensitivity response induced to oxazolone at an unirradiated skin site, and HO enzyme activity was measured in cutaneous microsomal preparations from treated mice. There was a progressive increase in HO enzyme activity for at least 3 days after UVA irradiation. However HO activity, both constitutive and UVA radiation-induced, was sensitive to the effects of injecting mice with the specific HO inhibitor, tin protoporphyrin (Sn [IV] protoporphyrin IX; SnPP). We observed, in addition, that in SnPP-injected mice, the immunoprotective effect of UVA radiation against either UVB radiation or cis-UCA was abrogated. Because SnPP injection did not affect normal contact hypersensitivity responsiveness but did inhibit the constitutive HO enzyme activity, it appeared that only the inducible HO was active in modulating immune function. This finding indicates that UVA-induced HO activity is a major player in the skin defenses against UVB immunosuppression.
“…We have found in mice that UVA irradiation protects from UVB-induced immunosuppression. 1 We observed different cytokine modulation in mouse epidermis by the UVA and UVB wavebands: UVA acts as an inducer of Th1-derived cytokines like IL-12 and IFN-γ, while UVB is responsible for induction of Th2-derived cytokines like IL-10, a major cause of immunosuppression. 2 However, the underlying mechanism(s) by which UVA achieved immunoprotection against UVB have remained undefined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…1 Mouse skins were fixed, processed and paraffin embedded immediately and at 24 hourly intervals for 5 days post-irradiation. FasL antibody was used to detect FasL expression in mouse skin by immunohistochemistry.…”
“…They indicated that the mechanism of UVA immunoprotection involves the induction of cutaneous HO-1 (37,38). Moreover, they reported that UVA irradiation upregulated HO-1 in the dermis and epidermis of hairless mouse skin, and UVA-induced HO enzyme activity is protective against UVB-induced immunosuppression (10,39).…”
Section: Ho-1 In Uva-induced Immunoprotectionmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.