2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrathin TiO2 surface layer coated TiN nanoparticles in freestanding film for high sulfur loading Li-S battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We subsequently examined the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the oxide powders after trapping the polysulfides after the adsorption analysis to understand the polysulfide adsorption chemistry of different oxide materials (Figure ). The XPS S 2p spectra of the oxide materials shown in Figure a display three main peaks, which are identified as the peak at 169.3–168.8 eV that is ascribed to the polythionate complex, the peak at 167.0–166.8 eV that is ascribed to thiosulfate, and the peaks at 164.8–163.0 and 163.0–162.1 eV that are ascribed to the S b 0 and S t –1 of polysulfides, respectively. , Specifically, the identified polythionate complex suggests the trapped long-chain polysulfide, while the inspected thiosulfate is a short-chain polysulfide, which might be the product of the redox reaction between the oxide powders and their trapped polysulfide species. , The terminal S t –1 and bridge S b are the bonding of polysulfide molecules. The XPS spectra of the metal elements of the individual oxide powder before and after the polysulfide adsorption analysis are summarized in Figure b–f, which are presented as TiO 2 , ZrO 2 , SiO 2 , ZnO, and Al 2 O 3 in sequence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We subsequently examined the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the oxide powders after trapping the polysulfides after the adsorption analysis to understand the polysulfide adsorption chemistry of different oxide materials (Figure ). The XPS S 2p spectra of the oxide materials shown in Figure a display three main peaks, which are identified as the peak at 169.3–168.8 eV that is ascribed to the polythionate complex, the peak at 167.0–166.8 eV that is ascribed to thiosulfate, and the peaks at 164.8–163.0 and 163.0–162.1 eV that are ascribed to the S b 0 and S t –1 of polysulfides, respectively. , Specifically, the identified polythionate complex suggests the trapped long-chain polysulfide, while the inspected thiosulfate is a short-chain polysulfide, which might be the product of the redox reaction between the oxide powders and their trapped polysulfide species. , The terminal S t –1 and bridge S b are the bonding of polysulfide molecules. The XPS spectra of the metal elements of the individual oxide powder before and after the polysulfide adsorption analysis are summarized in Figure b–f, which are presented as TiO 2 , ZrO 2 , SiO 2 , ZnO, and Al 2 O 3 in sequence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Instead, the two anodic peaks can be attributed to the oxidation of Li 2 S toward soluble Li 2 S x and sulfur, respectively. [31][32][33][34] Compared to the peaks of the V 2 O 5 -S and C-S cathodes, the cathodic peaks shift to higher potential, and the anodic peak shift to lower potential for the VN/V 2 O 5 -S cathode. The significantly different results indicated relatively enhanced reaction kinetics for LiPSs redox by adding VN/V 2 O 5 host as compared to V 2 O 5 and C. Moreover, the rate capabilities of the VN/V 2 O 5 -S, V 2 O 5 -S, and C-S cathodes were evaluated by the GCD profiles from 0.2 to 5C per every 5 cycles and returning to 1C and 0.2C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most of these polar hosts are poorly conductive and slightly catalytically active, they still need to be combined with high conductivity catalysts to ensure their fast trapping, localization, and conversion capabilities for Li 2 S. Recently, some prospective researchers have been devoted to tackling the above problems by introducing catalysts into host materials. Until now, various hosts with catalysts, including VO 2 –VN, 32 TiO 2 –TiN, 33,34 MoS 2 –GN, 31 WS 2 –WO 3 , 7 TiN–VN, 27 etc . have been developed to accelerate the LiPSs conversion and effectively suppress their shuttling in the Li–S batteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries with energy density of 2600 Wh kg -1 , which is several times higher than the stateof-the-art lithium-ion batteries, are promising candidates for next generation energy storage devices. [1][2][3] Unfortunately, the commercialization of Li-S batteries has been plagued by some intrinsic and fundamental challenges, including the dissolution of lithium polysulfide in ether electrolytes and the insulating nature of sulfur-related species. The former leads to rapid capacity declining, low Coulombic efficiency and the latter causes low sulfur utilization and failure of Li-S batteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%