2014
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201402118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrathin Graphitic C3N4 Nanosheets/Graphene Composites: Efficient Organic Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Abstract: Graphitic C3 N4 (g-C3 N4 ) is used as a low-cost organic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalyst. The integration of ultrathin g-C3 N4 nanosheets with graphene leads to g-C3 N4 /graphene composites with high OER activity and good durability. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies suggest that the OER activity results from pyridinic-N-related active sites. This catalyst provides an alternative to OER catalysts based on transition metals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
142
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
142
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is lower than that of OGF electrode (0.410 V), and also much lower than those of carbon fi lms reported previously, such as N, O-dual doped graphene-CNT hydrogel fi lm (NG/CNT, ≈0.484 V), [ 21 ] oxidized carbon cloth (OCC-8, 0.477 V), [ 22 ] 3D hybrid fi lm of porous N-doped graphene-NiCo 2 O 4 (PNG-NiCo,0.432 V), [ 24 ] and 3D N-doped carbon fi lm assembled by graphene and graphitic carbon nitride (G-C 3 N 4 , 0.415 V) [ 25 ] (Figure 3 F and Table S4, Supporting Information). The electrocatalytic activity of NSGF electrode is also superior to those of previously reported metal-free catalysts, including mildly oxidized multiwalled CNTs that activated by hydrothermal and electrochemical treatments (echoMWCNTs, 0.450 V), [ 17 ] N-doped graphene/single-walled CNT hybrid (NGSH, 0.400 V), [ 50 ] graphitic carbon nitride/graphene composites (g-C 3 N 4 /graphene, 0.539 V), [ 51 ] thermally reduced graphene oxide/N-doped CNTs (TRGO/NCNT, 0.505 V), [ 52 ] 3D Ni foam/porous carbon/anodized Ni electrode (3D-NF/PC/ AN, 0.520 V), [ 23 ] N-doped coaxial carbon nanocables (CNT@ NCNT, 0.527 V), [ 53 ] and even comparable to those of N-doped carbon material (N/C, 0.380 V) [ 20 ] and g-C 3 N 4 nanosheets-CNTs composite (g-C 3 N 4 NS-CNT, 0.370 V) [ 54 ] (Table S4 wileyonlinelibrary.com is a pure carbonaceous catalyst containing only C, N, O, and S nonmetallic elements, without blending other catalysts such as widely used g-C 3 N 4 , or metal species.…”
Section: The Electrocatalytic Performances For Oermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This value is lower than that of OGF electrode (0.410 V), and also much lower than those of carbon fi lms reported previously, such as N, O-dual doped graphene-CNT hydrogel fi lm (NG/CNT, ≈0.484 V), [ 21 ] oxidized carbon cloth (OCC-8, 0.477 V), [ 22 ] 3D hybrid fi lm of porous N-doped graphene-NiCo 2 O 4 (PNG-NiCo,0.432 V), [ 24 ] and 3D N-doped carbon fi lm assembled by graphene and graphitic carbon nitride (G-C 3 N 4 , 0.415 V) [ 25 ] (Figure 3 F and Table S4, Supporting Information). The electrocatalytic activity of NSGF electrode is also superior to those of previously reported metal-free catalysts, including mildly oxidized multiwalled CNTs that activated by hydrothermal and electrochemical treatments (echoMWCNTs, 0.450 V), [ 17 ] N-doped graphene/single-walled CNT hybrid (NGSH, 0.400 V), [ 50 ] graphitic carbon nitride/graphene composites (g-C 3 N 4 /graphene, 0.539 V), [ 51 ] thermally reduced graphene oxide/N-doped CNTs (TRGO/NCNT, 0.505 V), [ 52 ] 3D Ni foam/porous carbon/anodized Ni electrode (3D-NF/PC/ AN, 0.520 V), [ 23 ] N-doped coaxial carbon nanocables (CNT@ NCNT, 0.527 V), [ 53 ] and even comparable to those of N-doped carbon material (N/C, 0.380 V) [ 20 ] and g-C 3 N 4 nanosheets-CNTs composite (g-C 3 N 4 NS-CNT, 0.370 V) [ 54 ] (Table S4 wileyonlinelibrary.com is a pure carbonaceous catalyst containing only C, N, O, and S nonmetallic elements, without blending other catalysts such as widely used g-C 3 N 4 , or metal species.…”
Section: The Electrocatalytic Performances For Oermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In particular, due to many advantages of easy operation, low-cost, environmental benignity, and no reason for interfacial defects, liquid-phase exfoliation, usually in conjunction with ultrasonic treatment has been intensively explored for producing ultrathin GCNNs by delaminating bulk GCN [28,31,32]. However, the obtained GCNNs usually have a thickness larger than 2 nm (> 5 layers) [30,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15] It is also well-known that the electrocatalytic performance is determined by catalyst structure and accessibility of active sites. It is of significant importance to maximize the electrochemical surface area to better facilitate the transport of reactants (OH − and O 2 ), and therefore enhance catalytic activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%