2021
DOI: 10.1002/pssr.202100267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrathin Aluminum Oxide Films Induced by Rapid Thermal Annealing for Effective Silicon Surface Passivation

Abstract: A novel method of preparing ultrathin aluminum oxide films by rapid thermal annealing (RTA) treatment for effective silicon surface passivation is proposed. The high‐temperature RTA processing (750–825 °C) for tens of seconds in an oxygen atmosphere completely converts the thermally evaporated aluminum metal nanofilms (1–5 nm) on crystalline silicon to aluminum oxide (Al2O3) films, with a thin SiOx layer formed at the interface between the silicon and the Al2O3. The generated Al2O3 film can provide superior pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that high activation energy barriers computed in several steps are reasonable, considering the DFT-computed activation energy barriers of reaction schemes for Al 2 O 3 ALD processes in previous studies. , Moreover, the difference in the activation energy barrier between the three reaction schemes during the two key competitions is much more important to draw a meaningful conclusion on the relative reaction feasibility than the absolute activation energy barriers of reaction schemes. Thus, the primary conclusions on the relative feasibility of the three schemes drawn in this study would not be affected by the potentially unrealistic activation energy barriers in some steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that high activation energy barriers computed in several steps are reasonable, considering the DFT-computed activation energy barriers of reaction schemes for Al 2 O 3 ALD processes in previous studies. , Moreover, the difference in the activation energy barrier between the three reaction schemes during the two key competitions is much more important to draw a meaningful conclusion on the relative reaction feasibility than the absolute activation energy barriers of reaction schemes. Thus, the primary conclusions on the relative feasibility of the three schemes drawn in this study would not be affected by the potentially unrealistic activation energy barriers in some steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%