2000
DOI: 10.1094/phyto.2000.90.8.843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructure of the Penetration and Infection of Pansy Roots by Thielaviopsis basicola

Abstract: Transmission electron microscopy was used to study the penetration and infection of pansy roots by Thielaviopsis basicola. Events observed in 7- to 10-day-old roots produced on moist filter paper differed slightly from those in roots from 4-week-old plants washed free of potting media prior to inoculation. By 3 h postinoculation (PI), epidermal cells of roots produced on filter paper exhibited aggregated cytoplasm and papilla formation in response to germ tube tips. The presence of callose in papillae was demo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fungal growth rate, although decreased by such plant cell wall modifications, was not arrested. This was also observed for several fungal root pathogens (Rodríguez‐Gálvez & Mendgen, 1995; Mims et al ., 2000). However, other factors might be controlling fungus spread in tomato, since no long lignitubers were found in A. oligospora ‐colonized roots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Fungal growth rate, although decreased by such plant cell wall modifications, was not arrested. This was also observed for several fungal root pathogens (Rodríguez‐Gálvez & Mendgen, 1995; Mims et al ., 2000). However, other factors might be controlling fungus spread in tomato, since no long lignitubers were found in A. oligospora ‐colonized roots.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Regarding defense responses to pathogen attack, particular attention has been focused on the formation of cell wall thickenings. So-called papillae contain callose as the most common chemical constituent, but also proteins (e.g., peroxidases and thionins), phenolics, and other antimicrobial and antifungal constituents (Aist and Williams, 1971;Sargent et al, 1973;Mercer et al, 1974;Sherwood and Vance, 1976;Mims et al, 2000). Even though callose deposition appears to be an ubiquitous plant defense response to invading pathogens and has been studied for over 150 years (deBary, 1863), the specific function of callose in this defense reaction has remained unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, examinations have identified callose as the most abundant chemical constituent in papillae, which may also include proteins (e.g. peroxidases and antimicrobial thionins), phenolics, and other constituents (Aist and Williams, 1971;Sherwood and Vance, 1976;Mims et al, 2000). Papillae have been regarded as an early defense reaction that may not completely stop the pathogen; rather, they have been considered to act as a physical barrier to slow pathogen invasion (Stone and Clarke, 1992;Voigt and Somerville, 2009) and to contribute to the plant's innate immunity (Jones and Dangl, 2006;Schwessinger and Ronald, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%