1971
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(71)90205-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructure of rat odontoblasts in various stages of their development and maturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
65
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unlabelled cells could represent replacement odontoblasts derived from a population of G,-blocked, predetermined cells that responded to the inducing event by entering M-phase directly and thus not incorporating [3H]-thymidine. Such a mechanism has been proposed by Stanley (1962), Takuma and Nagai (1971), and Slavkin (1974). Cotton (1968) and Tomeck and Wagner (1980) found no labelled odontoblast-like cells after tooth grinding without exposure and labelling with [3H]-thymidine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The unlabelled cells could represent replacement odontoblasts derived from a population of G,-blocked, predetermined cells that responded to the inducing event by entering M-phase directly and thus not incorporating [3H]-thymidine. Such a mechanism has been proposed by Stanley (1962), Takuma and Nagai (1971), and Slavkin (1974). Cotton (1968) and Tomeck and Wagner (1980) found no labelled odontoblast-like cells after tooth grinding without exposure and labelling with [3H]-thymidine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The existence of a G,-blocked, predetermined population of odontoblast replacement cells was suggested by Stanley (1962), Takuma and Nagai (1971), and Slavkin (1974) because of the similar morphology of cells in the cell-rich zone and the adjacent functioning, mature odontoblasts. Findings by Cotton (1968) and Torneck and Wagner (1980) seem to support this theory: they found no [3H]-thymidine-labelled odontoblast-like cells in rat molar pulps after tooth grinding without pulp exposure, which suggests that odontoblasts destroyed by the grinding were replaced by predetermined cells that did not replicate their DNA in response to the injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The morphology of odontoblasts reflects their functional activity and ranges from an active synthetic phase to a quiescent phase (35). However, the preferred use of terminology regarding the classification of odontoblasts is controversial, because several terms for differentiated odontoblasts have been used by different researchers, i.e., secretory, transitional, and aged odontoblasts (12), young and old odontoblasts (51), or the small integrin binding ligand, N-linked glycoprotein (SIBLING) family, which is composed of dentin sialophosphoprotein (Dspp), dentin matrix protein 1 (Dmp1), osteopontin (Opn), bone sialoprotein (Bsp), and matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (Mepe) (16). Dspp is proteolytically cleaved into dentin sialoprotein (Dsp) and dentin phosphoprotein (Dpp) (49,55).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these reports are considered together, it appears that the odontoblast lacks true desmosomes. Although "desmosomes" or "desmosome-like junctions" in the odontoblast have been described on the basis of electron microscopy (5,12,13,22), it should be noted that their ultrastructure is different from that of the desmosomes in epithelial cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%