1990
DOI: 10.1016/0248-4900(90)90359-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructure of E1 + 2 + 9 + 12 inversion breakpoints in Drosophila subobscura

Abstract: Summary— The ultrastructure of the Drosophila subobscura chromosome regions around the breakpoints of the complex E1 + 2 + 9 + 12 gene arrangement was analyzed. This overlapping inversion is formed by the association of the E1, E2, E9, and E12 simple inversions. Ultrastructure of sections involving 58D/59A, 61C/D, 62D/63A, 64B/C, 67A/B, and 68B/C breakpoints on Est chromosomes were compared with the ultrastructure of sections involving 58D/68B, 62D/64C, 59A/63A, 64B/68C, 67B/61C, and 67A/61B breakpoints on E1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the cytological level and according to the Kunze-Mühl and Müller 24 map for the E st arrangement, the E 12 inversion breakpoints would be located at sections 61C/61D and 67A/67B for the proximal and distal breakpoint, respectively. However, a later comparison of the banding pattern of chromosomal arrangements E st and E 1+2+9+12 led Cuenca et al 25 to propose section 61B/61C as the proximal breakpoint.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the cytological level and according to the Kunze-Mühl and Müller 24 map for the E st arrangement, the E 12 inversion breakpoints would be located at sections 61C/61D and 67A/67B for the proximal and distal breakpoint, respectively. However, a later comparison of the banding pattern of chromosomal arrangements E st and E 1+2+9+12 led Cuenca et al 25 to propose section 61B/61C as the proximal breakpoint.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%