2000
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.35.6.1114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructural Characterization of Yellow Shoulder Disorder in a Uniform Ripening Tomato Genotype

Abstract: Yellow shoulder disorder (YSD) is characterized by sectors of yellow or green tissue under the peel of uniform ripening tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit. Tissues excised from sectors of fruit expressing YSD, from adjacent red sectors, and from mature green fruit were used to compare the ultrastructural alterations in cells and tissue affected by YSD and to determine whether the disorder is caused by delayed fruit maturation or by aberrant development. Cells from Y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variance components indicated that variation within fruit and among fruit in plots accounted for more than 75% of the environmental variation for the five color traits ( Table 2). Most of the within-fruit variation is due to yellow shoulder disorder (YSD) which is characterized by sectors of yellow or green tissue under the peel (Francis et al, 2000). The occurrence of this disorder resulted in an inflated error variance because of the large difference in CIELAB values between green and red tissue relative to the more subtle differences between red and orange-red fruit associated with genotypes (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Variance components indicated that variation within fruit and among fruit in plots accounted for more than 75% of the environmental variation for the five color traits ( Table 2). Most of the within-fruit variation is due to yellow shoulder disorder (YSD) which is characterized by sectors of yellow or green tissue under the peel (Francis et al, 2000). The occurrence of this disorder resulted in an inflated error variance because of the large difference in CIELAB values between green and red tissue relative to the more subtle differences between red and orange-red fruit associated with genotypes (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any differences among locations may also contribute to color variation. The fruit samples for this study were drawn form a location with a high incidence of YSD (Francis et al, 2000), and we have probably overestimated the within-fruit and within-plot variation relative to environments that are conducive to uniform fruit color. If, through the addition of further locations, σ 2 gL and related interactions were large and the withinfruit and within-plot variance components were not affected, then more sampling would be required.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Environmental differences were signifi cant for hue (p = 0.0045) and L (p = 0.0137) while genotype × environment interactions were signifi cant for hue (p = 0.0058), L (p = 0.0001), and chroma (p = 0.0001). The signifi cant environment and genotype × environment interactions may be due to a high incidence of the physiological color disorder, yellow shoulder disorder (YSD), prevalent at the OARDC farm in Fremont, Ohio (Francis et al, 2000). A signifi cant positive linear correlation was observed between hue and L values (r = 0.895, p < 0.0001) but not between hue and chroma (r = 0.075, p = 0.0872) or L and chroma (r = 0.0675, p = 0.165).…”
Section: Phenotypic Evaluation Of Tomato Color In the La407mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…YSD is a blotchy ripening disorder that is characterized by discolored regions under the epidermis of mature fruit. Cells from YSD tissue are smaller and more randomly organized, and the conversion from chloroplasts to chromoplasts is altered (Francis et al, 2000). Variation for YSD within fruit and among fruit in plots explained more than 75% of the variation for color (Sacks and Francis, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%