2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4830092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastrong coupling of intersubband plasmons and terahertz metamaterials

Abstract: We report on the ultrastrong-coupling between localized plasmons of a planar terahertz metamaterial and intersubband plasmons in a modulation doped quantum well sample. Such a system exhibits the formation of a lower and an upper polariton branch when the metamaterial eigenfrequency is tuned close to resonance with the intersubband transition. We achieve a normalized polariton splitting of 22% and a polaritonic gap of 2.4% of the intersubband transition frequency. In addition to the usual geometrical scaling, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to a further lateral depletion of the QWs originating from surface traps at the etched surface of the absorbing region, as already reported in the case of etched pillar or nanowire structures. 22,45,46 From our data, we infer a plasma frequency for the LC resonators that is 7.6% lower than the one for the patch cavities. Correcting for this effect yields an overlap factor Ψ 2 = 0.79.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is due to a further lateral depletion of the QWs originating from surface traps at the etched surface of the absorbing region, as already reported in the case of etched pillar or nanowire structures. 22,45,46 From our data, we infer a plasma frequency for the LC resonators that is 7.6% lower than the one for the patch cavities. Correcting for this effect yields an overlap factor Ψ 2 = 0.79.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…When the strength of the light-matter coupling becomes comparable to the bare excitation frequencies, the interaction becomes non-perturbative. The rich phenomenology which becomes then observable [92,[96][97][98][240][241][242][243][244][245][246][247][248][249][250][251][252][253][254][255][256][257][258][259] has led to a remarkable interest in those nonperturbative regimes, which have been experimentally realized in a number of experimental implementations well described, at least in first approximation [260][261][262][263][264], by the Dicke model [265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273][274][275][276][277][278][279][280][281]. A number of works investigated the impact of losses in this...…”
Section: F Ultrastrong-coupling Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A term "Ultrastrong coupling" (USC) had also been introduced to describe the situation where the coupling (Rabi) energy becomes comparable to the photon energy itself, meaning that the coupling changes electronic structure of the material itself. This regime is difficult to achieve in the optical range of frequencies but it can be feasible with THz radiation [11,12] At the same time, with the MQW exciton polariton in the semiconductor cavity another, intermediate, regime of the so-called "very strong coupling" (VSC) exits in which the Rabi energy Ω  is much less than photon energy ω  but it is comparable or larger than the exciton binding energy E X . Then as shown in [13]one can no longer consider coupling as a weak perturbation to the "rigid" exciton -the exciton in cavity polariton becomes flexible, or, better said, "pliable" as its radius decreases for the lower polariton and increases for the upper one causing increase of the effective binding energy in the lower polariton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%