2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-020-10232-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound: Validity of a Pocket-Sized System in the Assessment of Swallowing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
1
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…measures. While this finding mirrors validity data of pocket-sized ultrasound in the assessment of healthy swallowing despite the use of slightly different measurement methods for thyrohyoid approximation (Winiker et al, 2021a), it does not align with published data of larger ultrasound equipment (Hsiao et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2009). Discrepancies may be explained by differences in image quality due to differing ultrasound technology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…measures. While this finding mirrors validity data of pocket-sized ultrasound in the assessment of healthy swallowing despite the use of slightly different measurement methods for thyrohyoid approximation (Winiker et al, 2021a), it does not align with published data of larger ultrasound equipment (Hsiao et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2009). Discrepancies may be explained by differences in image quality due to differing ultrasound technology.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Further, reliable and valid assessment is related to assessment protocols and equipment selection; for example, reliability and validity may be impacted by the choice of US device. While there are some data to suggest that standard-sized US equipment may provide reliable and valid swallowing measures [ 5 , 12 , 16 ], this could not be confirmed for pocket-sized technology [ 24 , 60 ]. The method of data acquisition, such as the use of hand-held versus fixed transducers, may further affect reliability [ 61 , 62 ]; as might variability between different data collection settings, for example, data collected in the clinical versus research environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging evidence that supports the use of US to detect bolus residue and aspiration may also extend its range of potential applications in the clinical setting [ 20 22 ]. Technological advances in US imaging quality [ 23 ], and increasing accessibility and portability of US devices [ 24 , 25 ], further support the rationale to determine the optimal approaches for effective implementation of US into clinical practice that are sustainable and evidence-based.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, HxD max was calculated by the difference between the maximum and minimum Hx values extracted from the swallow region defined by when the bolus starts to approach the mouth until the completion of the swallow. While the position of the hyoid before the beginning of a swallow has been used in most previous studies as the resting position (e.g., Hsiao et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2016), Molfenter and Steele (2011) reported variability in how the rest frame is defined, including hyoid position before swallow (Vandaele et al., 1995), after swallow (Winiker et al., 2021) or the moment before bolus being propelled into the pharynx (Kim & McCullough, 2008). From observing the recorded data, it was noted that the lowest hyoid position was not always found before the swallow, especially when there is an anticipatory pre‐swallow raising of the hyoid position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyoid displacement has previously been investigated as an indicator of the functioning of pharyngeal swallow in normal and disordered populations using VFSS (Kang et al., 2010; Paik et al., 2008). A recent study comparing hyoid excursion in ultrasound and videofluroscopic study of swallowing reported a strong correlation between the two instrumental measures during a dry and a liquid swallow, but not for a puree swallow (Winiker et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%