2012
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2012.665568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-mediated gene transfection in vitro: Effect of ultrasonic parameters on efficiency and cell viability

Abstract: Ultrasound (US)-mediated gene transfection in the presence of microbubbles is a recently developed and promising non-viral gene delivery method. Optimising the parameters used in ultrasonic transfection is urgently required in order to realise higher transfection efficiencies in clinical settings. This study examined the effect of ultrasound exposure parameters on plasmid DNA transfection in mouse embryonic fibroblast cell lines using perfluorobutane bubbles. Variations in US intensity (0-11 W/cm2), pulse repe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a considerable heterogeneity in the literature concerning sonoporation devices and procedures, leading to marked differences in transfection efficiency [ 10 , 23 25 ]. Another limitation is the fact that most devices are not user-friendly and therefore not adapted for routine use in research laboratories [ 17 , 25 26 ]. Some investigators have obtained improved transfection efficiency and chemotherapeutic drug delivery using ultrasound by combining this approach with contrast agents [ 23 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a considerable heterogeneity in the literature concerning sonoporation devices and procedures, leading to marked differences in transfection efficiency [ 10 , 23 25 ]. Another limitation is the fact that most devices are not user-friendly and therefore not adapted for routine use in research laboratories [ 17 , 25 26 ]. Some investigators have obtained improved transfection efficiency and chemotherapeutic drug delivery using ultrasound by combining this approach with contrast agents [ 23 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three mechanical actions can be distinguished: (i) Radiation force action; (ii) pressure interaction with the cell membrane mechanosensors; and (iii) cavitation, which is stable if the bubble just oscillates and inertial if it collapses. Cavitation effects in in vitro cultures have been reported previously [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Changes produced in the cells include membrane disruption, opening of reversible or irreversible pores, ion channels, and toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Among the physical effects of ultrasound (US), sonoporation is considered the most important and intriguing. Briefly, as the US waves propagate through the medium, the rapid growth in size (rarefaction) and the collapse of microbubbles (compression) lead to the implosion of the microbubbles (Sirsi and Borden, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012). Formation of shock waves, bubble wall motion, and microjets provide the energy for sonoporation of cell membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%