2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06527-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules based on the degree of hypoechogenicity and echotexture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypoechogenicity showed fair diagnostic performance in our review (AUC = 0.8092). A previous study ( 32 ) that subdivided TNs based on their degree of hypoechogenicity also found that TNs with marked or moderate hypoehcogenicity had significantly higher malignant risks than mild hypoechogenicity (p < 0.001). This feature related closely with malignancy from the perspective of pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Hypoechogenicity showed fair diagnostic performance in our review (AUC = 0.8092). A previous study ( 32 ) that subdivided TNs based on their degree of hypoechogenicity also found that TNs with marked or moderate hypoehcogenicity had significantly higher malignant risks than mild hypoechogenicity (p < 0.001). This feature related closely with malignancy from the perspective of pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Heterogeneous predominantly hypoechoic nodules showed a significantly higher malignancy risk than predominantly iso-or hyperechoic thyroid nodules. There were no significant differences of malignancy risk between heterogeneous predominantly hypoechoic and homogeneous hypoechoic nodules according to the degree of hypoechogenicity and between heterogeneous predominantly iso-or hyperechoic nodules and homogeneous iso-or hyperechoic nodules [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Echogenicity: the EU-TIRADS considers that even a small hypoechoic part is sufficient to classify the nodule as hypoechoic, whereas K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS define the echogenicity of the nodule by its predominant one in heterogeneous nodules. The correctness of the definition of the K-TIRADSs seems to have been confirmed in a report on 2255 nodules, with a retrospective design [25]. Finally, the term markedly hypoechoic applies in the K-TIRADS as more or of equivalent hypoechogenicity to the strap muscles and in the other systems only as more hypoechoic than strap muscles.…”
Section: Lexiconmentioning
confidence: 82%