Overseas experience indicated that both oral cholecystography (OCG) and ultrasonic cholecystography (UCG) are equally accurate for the diagnosis of gall stones. The purpose of our study was to assess the local accuracy of these two modalities in a busy teaching hospital where both examinations were frequently requested on a patient suspected of suffering from gall stones. Our study agreed with the overseas experience that both modalities are equally reliable. A protocol was evolved, based on consideration of convenience to patients, availability of equipment, and utilization of time of trained operators. Oral cholecystography is performed on the initial examination, with early recourse to ultrasound whenever the first dose cholecystogram does not provide a definitive diagnosis. Careful integration of the two modalities is necessary if hard‐pressed diagnostic facilities are to be used efficiently. Patients also benefit by requiring fewer visits to hospital.