2010
DOI: 10.1002/acr.20241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound in American Rheumatology Practice: Report of the American College of Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Task Force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 126 publications
(158 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Regarding the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections, the American College of Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Task Force supports US-guided procedures, given that their accuracy is superior to that of blind injections, especially when administered by inexperienced physicians [3]. A comparative analysis of US-guided vs. blind injections has shown the superiority of the former in terms of precision, efficacy, and avoidance of drug deposition in non-target tissues, such as the synovium, fatty tissue, cartilage, tendons, and ligaments [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Regarding the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections, the American College of Rheumatology Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Task Force supports US-guided procedures, given that their accuracy is superior to that of blind injections, especially when administered by inexperienced physicians [3]. A comparative analysis of US-guided vs. blind injections has shown the superiority of the former in terms of precision, efficacy, and avoidance of drug deposition in non-target tissues, such as the synovium, fatty tissue, cartilage, tendons, and ligaments [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%