Ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery: approaches to minimize surgically induced image artefacts for improved resection control

Selbekk, Tormod; Jakola, Asgeir Store; Solheim, Ole; Johansen, Tonni Franke; Lindseth, Frank; Reinertsen, Ingerid; Unsgård, Geirmund

doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1647-7

Cited by 150 publications

(120 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

119

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Many strategies have been described to reduce these artifacts, making it possible to eliminate the majority. 28 The bigger problem is probably that of lack of anatomical orientation. Traditionally, B-mode ultrasound images are displayed in planar format, with the view limited to the field insonated (which may be a sector or a rectangular display depending on the probe used) and in the plane of insonation (which The left side of the screenshot shows the plane of acquisition of this image with respect to the preresection US (white sector outline superimposed on the preresection tumor image).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct navigated 3D ultrasound for resection of brain tumors: a useful tool for intraoperative image guidance

Moiyadi¹,

Shetty²

2016

FOC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE Navigated 3D ultrasound is a novel intraoperative imaging adjunct permitting quick real-time updates to facilitate tumor resection. Image quality continues to improve and is currently sufficient to allow use of navigated ultrasound (NUS) as a stand-alone modality for intraoperative guidance without the need for preoperative MRI. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed cases involving operations performed at their institution in which a 3D ultrasound navigation system was used for control of resection of brain tumors in a “direct” 3D ultrasound mode, without preoperative MRI guidance. The usefulness of the ultrasound and its correlation with postoperative imaging were evaluated. RESULTS Ultrasound was used for resection control in 81 cases. In 53 of these 81 cases, at least 1 intermediate scan (range 1–3 intermediate scans) was obtained during the course of the resection, and in 50 of these 53 cases, the result prompted further resection. In the remaining 28 cases, intermediate scans were not performed either because the first ultrasound scan performed after resection was interpreted as showing no residual tumor (n = 18) and resection was terminated or because the surgeon intentionally terminated the resection prematurely due to the infiltrative nature of the tumor and extension of disease into eloquent areas (n = 10) and the final ultrasound scan was interpreted as showing residual disease. In an additional 20 cases, ultrasound navigation was used primarily for localization and not for resection control, making the total number of NUS cases where radical resection was planned 101. Gross-total resection (GTR) was planned in 68 of these 101 cases and cytoreduction in 33. Ultrasound-defined GTR was achieved in 51 (75%) of the cases in which GTR was planned. In the remaining 17, further resection had to be terminated (despite evidence of residual tumor on ultrasound) because of diffuse infiltration or proximity to eloquent areas. Of the 33 cases planned for cytoreduction, NUS guidance facilitated ultrasound-defined GTR in 4 cases. Overall, ultrasound-defined GTR was achieved in 50% of cases (55 of 111). Based on the postoperative imaging (MRI in most cases), GTR was achieved in 58 cases (53%). Final (postresection) ultrasonography was documented in 78 cases. The findings were compared with the postoperative imaging to ascertain concordance in detecting residual tumor. Overall concordance was seen in 64 cases (82.5%), positive concordance was seen in 33 (42.5%), and negative in 31 (40%). Discordance was seen in 14 cases—with ultrasound yielding false-positive results in 7 cases and false-negative results in 7 cases. Postoperative neurological worsening occurred in 15 cases (13.5%), and in most of these cases, it was reversible by the time of discharge. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate that 3D ultrasound can be effectively used as a stand-alone navigation modality during the resection of brain tumors. The ability to provide repeated, high-quality intraoperative updates is useful for guiding resection. Attention to image acquisition technique and experience can significantly increase the quality of images, thereby improving the overall utility of this modality.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct navigated 3D ultrasound for resection of brain tumors: a useful tool for intraoperative image guidance

Moiyadi¹,

Shetty²

2016

FOC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, we must consider the difficulty to visualize the parenchyma in case of profused bleeding or excessive use of hemostatic material, which is highly hyperechoic [20].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fusion imaging for intra-operative ultrasound-based navigation in neurosurgery

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The major shortcoming of image-guided navigation systems is the use of presurgically acquired image data, which does not account for intra-operative changes such as brain shift, tissue deformation and tissue removal occurring during the surgical procedure. Intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) is becoming widely used in neurosurgery but they lack orientation and panoramic view. In this article, we describe our procedure for US-based real-time neuro-navigation during surgery. We used fusion imaging between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and iUS for brain lesion removal in 67 patients so far. Surgical planning is based on preoperative MRI only. iUS images obtained during surgery are fused with the preoperative MRI. Surgery is performed under intra-operative US control. Relying on US imaging, it is possible to recalibrate navigated MRI imaging, adjusting distortion due to brain shift and tissue resection, continuously updating the two modalities. Ultrasound imaging provides excellent visualization of targets, their margins and surrounding structures. The use of navigated MRI is helpful in better understanding cerebral ultrasound images, providing orientation and panoramic view. Intraoperative US-guided neuro-navigation adjustments are very accurate and helpful in the event of brain shift. The use of this integrated system allows for a true real-time feedback during surgery.Keywords Navigation Á Brain shift Á Intraoperative imaging Á Ultrasound Á Brain tumor Á Fusion imaging Sommario Il principale difetto della neurochirurgia guidata da immagini è il basarsi su immagini acquisite prima dell'intervento, che per ovvie ragioni non possono tenere conto di fenomeni intra-operatori come il brain-shift, la deformazione dei tessuti e l'asportazione di tessuto patologico. L'ecografia intra-operatoria (iUS) sta acquisendo sempre maggior rilevanza in ambito neurochirurgico ma è limitata dalla difficoltosa interpretazione dell'orientamento delle immagini e dalla scarsa panoramicità. In questo articolo descriviamo la nostra tecnica di neuronavigazione real-time basata sull'ecografia intra-operatoria. Fino ad ora abbiamo impiegato la fusione d'immagini tra la risonanza magnetica (MRI) pre-operatoria e l'iUS in 67 pazienti affetti da neoplasie cerebrali. La pianificazione dell'intervento e l'approccio chirurgico è basata sulla (MRI) pre-operatoria mentre l'intervento è guidato dall'iUS. Basandosi sull'iUS è possibile correggere la calibrazione delle immagini (MRI) pre-operatorie correggendo il brain-shift, aggiornando continuamente le due modalità. L'ecografia intra-operatoria permette una eccellente identificazione dei target, dei margini e delle strutture circostanti. L'uso del navigatore basato su (MRI) pre-operatoria è utile nella comprensione delle immagini ecografiche soprattutto per quanto riguarda l'orientazione e la visione panoramica. Le correzione del sistema di neuronavigazione basate sull'iUS sono accurate e utili nel caso di fenomeni intra-operatori come il brain-shift, la deformazione dei tessuti ...

show abstract

“…The B-mode evaluation after subtotal tumor resection was not helpful in classifying a hyperechoic area as residual tumor, mainly because of artifacts and surgical manipulation 13,27,29,32,33 (Figs. 3-5).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6,7,16,18 Artifacts are in fact the main limitation in iUS B-mode interpretation in glioma surgery. 13,27,29,32,33 Surgical maneuvers inevitably lead to difficulty in ultrasound discrimination between residual tumor and surgically induced edema or artifacts. In particular, at the end of tumor resection it is difficult to assess if a hyperechoic area is actually residual tumor (Figs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Identification of residual tumor with intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound during glioblastoma resection

Prada¹,

Bene²,

Fornaro³

et al. 2016

FOC

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the capability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to identify residual tumor mass during glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) surgery, to increase the extent of resection. METHODS The authors prospectively evaluated 10 patients who underwent surgery for GBM removal with navigated ultrasound guidance. Navigated B-mode and CEUS were performed prior to resection, during resection, and after complete tumor resection. Areas suspected for residual tumors on B-mode and CEUS studies were localized within the surgical field with navigated ultrasound and samples were sent separately for histopathological analysis to confirm tumor presence. RESULTS In all cases tumor remnants were visualized as hyperechoic areas on B-mode, highlighted as CEUS-positive areas, and confirmed as tumoral areas on histopathological analysis. In 1 case only, CEUS partially failed to demonstrate residual tumor because the residual hyperechoic area was devascularized prior to ultrasound contrast agent injection. In all cases CEUS enhanced B-mode findings. CONCLUSIONS As has already been shown in other neoplastic lesions in other organs, CEUS is extremely specific in the identification of residual tumor. The ability of CEUS to distinguish between tumor and artifacts or normal brain on B-mode is based on its capacity to show the vascularization degree and not the echogenicity of the tissues. Therefore, CEUS can play a decisive role in the process of maximizing GBM resection.

show abstract

Ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery: approaches to minimize surgically induced image artefacts for improved resection control

Cited by 150 publications

References 19 publications

Direct navigated 3D ultrasound for resection of brain tumors: a useful tool for intraoperative image guidance

Direct navigated 3D ultrasound for resection of brain tumors: a useful tool for intraoperative image guidance

Fusion imaging for intra-operative ultrasound-based navigation in neurosurgery

Identification of residual tumor with intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound during glioblastoma resection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About