2019
DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-guided vs. palpation-guided techniques for radial arterial catheterisation in infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, in most situations, children with non-cyanotic congenital heart disease have good exposure of peripheral veins, which prevents the ultrasound method from showing its advantage of visualization compared with the traditional landmark method. The success rate of the rst attempt was used as one of the crucial metrics by many studies to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral venipuncture [3,16]. But no consistent conclusions have been drawn about the in uence of the use of ultrasound on the success rate at the rst attempt of peripheral venous access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, in most situations, children with non-cyanotic congenital heart disease have good exposure of peripheral veins, which prevents the ultrasound method from showing its advantage of visualization compared with the traditional landmark method. The success rate of the rst attempt was used as one of the crucial metrics by many studies to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral venipuncture [3,16]. But no consistent conclusions have been drawn about the in uence of the use of ultrasound on the success rate at the rst attempt of peripheral venous access.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be more suitable for cases of difficult cannulation of the radial artery, considering that the ultrasound technique may increase the cost to the patient. For some patients with high risk factors for difficult cannulation of radial artery, such as artery diameter less than 2.2 mm, critically ill children, 25 infants, 26 it is not clear whether this technique has advantages over traditional ultrasound and palpation techniques. Three anesthesiologists in the CA1, CA3 and CA5 groups were involved in the study, so the Hawthorne effect could not be completely excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two hundred eighty-six articles were identified from electronic databases (excluding duplicates). After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] were finally included in this meta-analysis. All seven studies were randomized controlled trials of radial artery catheterizations.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%