2014
DOI: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Interscalene Block

Abstract: In continuous interscalene blockade under ultrasound guidance after shoulder surgery, automated boluses of local anesthetic combined with PRN boluses did not provide any reduction in local anesthetic consumption or rescue analgesia, compared with continuous infusion combined with PRN boluses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 While the current investigation did compare repeated large (24 mL) bolus volumes with a steady basal infusion of 8 mL/h, the mass of ropivacaine administered was equivalent at Hours 3 and 6. Supporting this theory are three negative studies comparing a basal infusion and repeated bolus doses of equivalent local anesthetic mass for interscalene, 22 femoral, 21 and adductor canal 23 catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…16 While the current investigation did compare repeated large (24 mL) bolus volumes with a steady basal infusion of 8 mL/h, the mass of ropivacaine administered was equivalent at Hours 3 and 6. Supporting this theory are three negative studies comparing a basal infusion and repeated bolus doses of equivalent local anesthetic mass for interscalene, 22 femoral, 21 and adductor canal 23 catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Because ambulatory patients are discharged with a set reservoir volume that rarely exceeds 500 mL owing to weight and bulk limitations, the only way to extend analgesia duration is by decreasing local anesthetic consumption [ 1 ]. The results of studies comparing automated boluses with continuous infusions have been mixed, with results varying from significant to no benefit in the analgesia provided [ 1 3 , 9 11 ]. However, previous studies comparing automated boluses with continuous infusions for continuous peripheral nerve blocks have largely used the same basal dosing in both groups (e.g., 5 mL/h of continuous infusion compared with 5 mL of bolus every hour) [ 2 , 3 , 9 , 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of studies comparing automated boluses with continuous infusions have been mixed, with results varying from significant to no benefit in the analgesia provided [ 1 3 , 9 11 ]. However, previous studies comparing automated boluses with continuous infusions for continuous peripheral nerve blocks have largely used the same basal dosing in both groups (e.g., 5 mL/h of continuous infusion compared with 5 mL of bolus every hour) [ 2 , 3 , 9 , 11 ]. Because long-acting local anesthetics are generally used for cPNB [ 1 ], longer intervals between boluses might further lengthen the analgesic duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%