2017
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-guided block and the incidence of intraneural injection. A reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesise that this rotational and displacement response mechanism reduces subepineural and intrafascicular injection, and provides evidence to support the use of a tangential approach towards nerves. 30 Nerve expansion confirmed clinical observations using small test doses. Cross-sectional area increased 113% after 0.5 ml and 232% after total 1 ml injection.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Studysupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We hypothesise that this rotational and displacement response mechanism reduces subepineural and intrafascicular injection, and provides evidence to support the use of a tangential approach towards nerves. 30 Nerve expansion confirmed clinical observations using small test doses. Cross-sectional area increased 113% after 0.5 ml and 232% after total 1 ml injection.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Studysupporting
confidence: 65%
“…On the other hand it is very difficult to judge during an ultrasound guided procedure where exactly the needle tip is. In clinical practice, despite real‐time visualization of the needle tip with ultrasound, needle to nerve contact or epineurium perforation, cannot be prevented . Unintentional intraneural injection occurs at an incidence rate of 16.3% for the ultrasound‐guided subgluteal approach to the sciatic nerve .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors suggest the use of ultrasound to stay farer away from the nerval borders altogether 115 . We know that all local anesthetics can be neurotoxic to different degrees 116,117,118 . As this is a dose dependent effect, reducing concentration and volume -a proved advantage of USGRA -may reduce the risk of nerve damage.…”
Section: Further Ultrasound Related Approaches To Avoid Nerve Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%