2021
DOI: 10.11152/mu-2688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter (UGAP) for the quantification of liver steatosis using the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) as the reference method

Abstract: Aim: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is increasing in frequency in daily practice and evaluation of liver steatosis, fibrosis and inflammation severity are essential for prognosis assessment. The aim was to evaluate the usefulness of a new liver steatosis quantification system - Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter (UGAP) from General Electric Healthcare, using Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) as the reference method.Material and method: 179 consecutive subjects, in whom liver steatosis was a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors classified the cohort by means of CAP into the following groups: S0 (no steatosis), S1 (mild), S2 (moderate) and S3 (severe). The mean UGAP values increased with the steatosis grade and a very good positive correlation was found between UGAP and CAP values (r=0.73, p<0.0001) [6]. This method seems to provide an objective estimation of liver steatosis severity but is also a very good method to assess the efficacy of treatments during follow-up As many ultrasound systems have incorporated modules for steatosis and also fibrosis quantification, we have reached the time when such "multiparametric" ultrasound systems may enter clinical practice providing important and valuable information regarding the severity of steatosis and fibrosis in the NAFLD population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The authors classified the cohort by means of CAP into the following groups: S0 (no steatosis), S1 (mild), S2 (moderate) and S3 (severe). The mean UGAP values increased with the steatosis grade and a very good positive correlation was found between UGAP and CAP values (r=0.73, p<0.0001) [6]. This method seems to provide an objective estimation of liver steatosis severity but is also a very good method to assess the efficacy of treatments during follow-up As many ultrasound systems have incorporated modules for steatosis and also fibrosis quantification, we have reached the time when such "multiparametric" ultrasound systems may enter clinical practice providing important and valuable information regarding the severity of steatosis and fibrosis in the NAFLD population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Ultrasound (US) was the first-line imaging test used in clinical practice in individuals with suspected NAFLD [1]. Although it has a good accuracy for moderate-to-severe steatosis (sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 94%) its value in detect-ing steatosis of less than 20% is low [1,5,6]. Moreover, it cannot diagnose fibrosis and steatohepatitis, very important pathologic stages toward a severe liver disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations