Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006459.pub2
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade

Abstract: In experienced hands, ultrasound provides at least as good success rates as other methods of peripheral nerve location. Individual studies have demonstrated that ultrasound may reduce complication rates and improve quality, performance time, and time to onset of blocks. Due to wide variations in study outcomes we chose not to combine the studies in our analysis.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
147
20
15
1

Citation Types

2
68
1
3

Year Published

Range
2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
117
43
18

Relationship

0
178

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 178 publications

(74 citation statements)
references

References 41 publications

2
68
1
3
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Nevertheless, we also observed that to achieve this accuracy and safety, ultrasoundguided procedure required significantly more time and more needle passes than the palpation-guided procedure. Contrary to our results, previous studies found that ultrasound guidance can reduce the time of the procedure [25,29,38] and the number of passes [39]. These differences may be due to the fact that the technique evaluated in the current study, unlike previous studies, is a target-contact task, which requires a longer time to achieve a larger and accurate contact surface and, therefore, needs higher precision.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our study results demonstrated a significant reduction in the distance between the needle and the targeted tissue, e.g., interface between patellar tendon and Hoffa's fat pad, when employing ultrasound guidance. This finding supports the notion of precise needle tip placement, as previously suggested [23][24][25]. Previous studies with different ultrasound guidance procedures have obtained accuracy rates between 1.5 mm and 3.27 mm when using phantoms [28,36,37].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation