2009
DOI: 10.1053/j.trap.2009.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound guidance for epidural steroid injections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acoustic impedance of bone is high, and thus it has significant limitations for imaging spinal structures when the target is obscured by bone tissue. This gives rise to increased risk for accidental dural punctures due to decreased visibility [39]. Given that a higher US image resolution allows for decreased tissue penetration, it will be more difficult to identify neurovascular structures in patients who are more obese.…”
Section: Disadvantages Of Ultrasound-guided Spine Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The acoustic impedance of bone is high, and thus it has significant limitations for imaging spinal structures when the target is obscured by bone tissue. This gives rise to increased risk for accidental dural punctures due to decreased visibility [39]. Given that a higher US image resolution allows for decreased tissue penetration, it will be more difficult to identify neurovascular structures in patients who are more obese.…”
Section: Disadvantages Of Ultrasound-guided Spine Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortyseven of the 53 subjects had a positive flow spectrum and 50 of the 52 subjects with positive Doppler change, had fluoroscopic confirmation. The major limitation of the study was that even small movements of the needle could cause an artifactual color change and a false-positive sign could occur as seen by fluoroscopy in the patients with spread outside of the epidural space [39].…”
Section: Ultrasound-guided Caudal Epidural Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%