2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-Guidance Can Reduce Adverse Events During Femoral Central Venous Cannulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound guidance for CVC placement was not routinely used by all physicians, despite the proven superiority of ultrasound-guided CVC placement over the landmark technique [5][6][7][8][9]. We did not look into motives for the omission of ultrasound during insertion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound guidance for CVC placement was not routinely used by all physicians, despite the proven superiority of ultrasound-guided CVC placement over the landmark technique [5][6][7][8][9]. We did not look into motives for the omission of ultrasound during insertion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small prospective trials using US guidance for femoral venous access have demonstrated improved safety and overall success rates in patients on hemodialysis . A prospective study evaluating the use of US guided femoral central venous cannulation in the emergency room among 143 patients compared 60 central venous cannulations (42%) under US guidance to 83 (58%) via landmark technique and found a trend toward a decrease in recorded adverse events (3.3% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.145) in the US arm . The largest study assessing the use of US guided access in patients undergoing catheter based EP procedures was published by Wynn et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A prospective study evaluating the use of US guided femoral central venous cannulation in the emergency room among 143 patients compared 60 central venous cannulations (42%) under US guidance to 83 (58%) via landmark technique and found a trend toward a decrease in recorded adverse events (3.3% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.145) in the US arm. 10 The largest study assessing the use of US guided access in patients undergoing catheter based EP procedures was published by Wynn et al 11 from the United Kingdom. They prospectively assessed patients undergoing AF ablation procedures and compared femoral venous access using a standard approach in 146 patients and using US guided access in 163 patients.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Data On Ultrasound Guided Vascular Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to the left common femoral vein was then achieved using real-time ultrasound guidance. 5 The patient's girth required a very long access system. An Accustick system (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%