2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00438.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound for primary confirmation of mechanical capture in emergency transcutaneous pacing

Abstract: Clinical confirmation of mechanical capture in emergency transcutaneous pacing is sometimes difficult because of weak pulse volume or interference from skeletal muscle contractions. This report is of a case of using bedside ultrasound for primary confirmation of emergency transcutaneous pacemaker capture, and for differentiating between causes of persistent hypotension despite successful pacing. The technique of ultrasound‐guided transcutaneous pacing is described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 We favor point-of-care-ultrasound as a gold standard due to established feasibility (Figure 2). [24][25][26][27] Additionally, we argue there is a need for swift investigation as our work showed clinicians may be unable to recognize post-TCP cardiac arrest due to false electrical capture, as seen in case #1. 12 In a recent national cohort, 1618 (20.4%) who received prehospital TCP experienced post-TCP cardiac arrest, exacerbating these concerns.…”
Section: Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 We favor point-of-care-ultrasound as a gold standard due to established feasibility (Figure 2). [24][25][26][27] Additionally, we argue there is a need for swift investigation as our work showed clinicians may be unable to recognize post-TCP cardiac arrest due to false electrical capture, as seen in case #1. 12 In a recent national cohort, 1618 (20.4%) who received prehospital TCP experienced post-TCP cardiac arrest, exacerbating these concerns.…”
Section: Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We favor point‐of‐care‐ultrasound as a gold standard due to established feasibility (Figure 2). 24–27 …”
Section: Paced Group (N = 27)mentioning
confidence: 99%