Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience 2006
DOI: 10.1159/000092386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection

Abstract: Ultrasound allows the reliable exclusion of spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery (sICAD) in patients with carotid territory ischemia. The possibility of falsely positive ultrasound findings indicates that cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and angiography must confirm ultrasonic suspicion of sICAD. The sensitivity of ultrasound for assessing sICAD which causes no carotid territory ischemia, but headache, neck pain, Horner syndrome, or palsy of the cranial nerves on the side of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of our study population resembled that of most previous single-as well as multicenter studies, with an average age in the mid-forties [14][15][16], the male preponderance [14,15,21], the higher rate of ICAD than VAD [14,21], and the rate of occluded CeAD [15,22]. Likewise, the rate of detected mural hematomas (i.e., 31%) and intima flap (i.e., 10.5%) was similar to reported ultrasound studies [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characteristics of our study population resembled that of most previous single-as well as multicenter studies, with an average age in the mid-forties [14][15][16], the male preponderance [14,15,21], the higher rate of ICAD than VAD [14,21], and the rate of occluded CeAD [15,22]. Likewise, the rate of detected mural hematomas (i.e., 31%) and intima flap (i.e., 10.5%) was similar to reported ultrasound studies [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Both reviewers assessed the presence or absence of the following ultrasound findings (at baseline and each follow-up examination) applying criteria as described in prior research: (i) mural hematoma [16,17], (ii) intimal flap [17], (iii) double lumen [17,18], (iv) dissecting aneurysm [17], and (v) occlusion. For the latter, we adapted the definition used in prior research (i.e., absence of detectable flow within the former lumen, isoechogenic or hypoechogenic, homogenous, or inhomogenous material within the former lumen, indirect signs attributable to pre-occlusion and post-occlusion hemodynamic alterations, detection of a so-called stump signal proximal to the occlusion) [5] and applied it also for VA occlusion.…”
Section: Review Of Dusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique assesses a reduction of blood flow with good sensitivity only with stenosis > 50% downstream; ultrasound investigation has poor sensitivity in non-stroke patients with isolated Horner syndrome [15]. B-mode images visualize the arterial wall and the surrounding tissue: they may identify the double lumen but with poor sensitivity and only when located in the proximal extracranial carotid segment [16]. MRA evaluates the vessel wall and is able to detect intramural hematoma despite vessel occlusion: axial MRA T1-weighted imaging with fat suppression allows an optimal discrimination between intramural hematoma and perivascular tissue [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the imaging diagnostic criteria have still not reached a consensus due to different available methods. In this study, we used the standard ultrasonography (US) for diagnosing ex-vertebral artery dissection, [1] which included multiple segmental intramural hematoma, the membranous tube cavity of the echo, double cavity structure, and irregular artery stenosis. Of these, only 1 or any 1 can be a definitive diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%