2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00102.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound detection of the Essure permanent birth control device: A case series

Abstract: Ultrasound appears to be well suited for micro-insert localisation. An early post insertion ultrasound scan is recommended to reassure about correct positioning of device and may potentially alleviate patient anxiety, or diagnose malposition early.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 HSG was reserved only for women with incorrect insertion or remaining uncertainty following plain radiological imaging. More recently, the placement of Essure has assessed using pelvic ultrasonography 5 and with an abdominal approach most of the devices can be adequately imaged. 6 Future research may confirm that ultrasonography is an acceptable alternativeto determine the correct placement of Essure TM device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 HSG was reserved only for women with incorrect insertion or remaining uncertainty following plain radiological imaging. More recently, the placement of Essure has assessed using pelvic ultrasonography 5 and with an abdominal approach most of the devices can be adequately imaged. 6 Future research may confirm that ultrasonography is an acceptable alternativeto determine the correct placement of Essure TM device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) examination has proved to be an adequate method to confirm the microinsert position at follow-up (5)(6)(7)(8). When ultrasound examination is inconclusive or an undesirable position of an insert is suspected, a hysterosalpingography (HSG) can be performed (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude that HSG is required only in unsatisfactory placements or special cases. The next step will be to replace the 3-month pelvic radiography with an earlier pelvic ultrasound to demonstrate the correct location of the microinserts to alleviate patient anxiety or diagnose malposition early as other authors propose [8]. Routine HSG can thus be avoided in most patients, along with its unnecessary risks, costs, inconvenience, and discomfort.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%