2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction plus simultaneous silylation for rapid determination of salicylate and benzophenone-type ultraviolet filters in aqueous samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were conducted under high temperatures (60 o C) and for at least 30 min of reaction time. Some authors couple extraction methods like DLLME (Wu et al, 2013) and SBSE (Kawaguchi et al, 2008) with in situ derivatisation, which seems to increase the throughput of sample analysis.…”
Section: Chromatographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies were conducted under high temperatures (60 o C) and for at least 30 min of reaction time. Some authors couple extraction methods like DLLME (Wu et al, 2013) and SBSE (Kawaguchi et al, 2008) with in situ derivatisation, which seems to increase the throughput of sample analysis.…”
Section: Chromatographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual combinations of extractant and disperser used of UVfilters extraction are chloroform/acetone (CHL/Ac) (Benedé et al, 2014;Tarazona et al, 2010;Tovar-Sánchez et al, 2013) and tetrachloroethylene/Ac (Wu et al, 2013 (Ye et al, 2011) are starting to be used, due to their unique physical and chemical properties, such as non-flammability, negligible vapour pressure, good extractability for a wide spectrum of inorganic, organic and organometallic compounds, as well as tuneable viscosity and miscibility with water and organic solvents (Zhang and Lee, 2012a). This technique was tested in five classes of UV-filters (benzophenone, camphor, salicylate, crylene and p-aminobenzoic acid derivatives) and conducted to high recovery rates (70-118%), using different matrices like river, lake, sea and swimming pool waters (Benedé et al, 2014;Wu et al, 2013;TovarSánchez et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2011;Tarazone et al, 2010).…”
Section: Dllme Is a Liquid-liquid Extraction (Lle) Based On The Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Tarazona et al [47], Negreira et al [48] and later Benedé et al [81], proposed classical DLLME with organochlorine solvents and acetone as extracting and disperser solvents, respectively. In order to increase the dispersion of the extracting solvent into the aqueous samples, Wu et al [75] proposed the use of ultrasounds to produce finer extracting droplets in the so-called ultrasound-assisted DLLME (USA-DLLME) approach. However, in order to avoid the presence of the disperser solvent, which usually decreases the partition coefficient of the target compounds into the extracting solvent, new approaches have been used.…”
Section: Uv Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding GC-MS, simple quadrupole analyzers (Q) are used in most of the cases, whereas ionic tramps (IT) [75] and time-of-flight (TOF) analyzers [50,56] have been also used but in scarce occasions. In the case of TOF, it was coupled to two-dimensional GC (i.e., GCxGC) [50,56].…”
Section: Uv Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation