2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound and electrophysiologic findings in patients with Guillain–Barré syndrome at disease onset and over a period of six months

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Grimm et al . observed CSAs at a third of the size of those reported by Cartwright et al ., ranging between 2.0 and 2.2 mm 2 . This relevant discrepancy may be at least partially explained by differing study cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grimm et al . observed CSAs at a third of the size of those reported by Cartwright et al ., ranging between 2.0 and 2.2 mm 2 . This relevant discrepancy may be at least partially explained by differing study cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is particularly applicable to the vagus nerve (VN) . Currently, only 2 ultrasound laboratories have reported reference values for VNs in healthy participants, with mean cross‐sectional areas (CSAs) varying widely between 2.0 mm 2 and 5.9 mm 2 . These reported differences may be partly attributed to the use of different ultrasound systems, varying measurement levels (ML), different methods of assessing CSA, and differences in the study populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective lesions in proximal nerve trunks may explain the discrepancy between nerve conduction and the established paralysis, as elegantly illustrated in electrophysiological [75] and ultrasonographic [76,77] studies of the ventral spinal nerves in AIDP and AMAN/AMSAN. The sensory nerve conduction study of sural nerve is normal in greater proportion of patients [78].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High‐resolution ultrasound (HR‐US) is the method of choice for imaging small cervical and peripheral nerves . Such imaging is relevant for: (i) localization to avoid harm during invasive procedures, (ii) localization to target therapeutics, and (iii) measuring nerve caliber for assessing compressive, inflammatory or degenerative neuropathies . For example, mild to moderate atrophy of the vagus nerve has been detected on HR‐US in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and in diabetic neuropathy .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%