The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.3233/ies-150586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonography for the assessment of the structural properties of the Achilles tendon in asymptomatic individuals: An intra-rater reproducibility study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we have to note that we used two different digitization methods for US and MRI image analysis. In the past, several US studies used manual tracing (Brushoj et al 2006; Dudley-Javoroski et al 2010; Intziegianni et al 2015), equation-based digitization (Milgrom et al 2014), or assumptions of the tendon shape (Kallinen and Suominen 1994) to assess the AT CSA. Moreover, MRI images were traced manually (Brushoj et al 2006) or automatically (Hansen et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we have to note that we used two different digitization methods for US and MRI image analysis. In the past, several US studies used manual tracing (Brushoj et al 2006; Dudley-Javoroski et al 2010; Intziegianni et al 2015), equation-based digitization (Milgrom et al 2014), or assumptions of the tendon shape (Kallinen and Suominen 1994) to assess the AT CSA. Moreover, MRI images were traced manually (Brushoj et al 2006) or automatically (Hansen et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies (Brushoj et al 2006; Dudley-Javoroski et al 2010; Foure et al 2011; Intziegianni et al 2015; Kallinen and Suominen 1994; Kongsgaard et al 2005; Magnusson et al 2001; Milgrom et al 2014; Rosager et al 2002; Waugh et al 2012; Ying et al 2003), we conducted the CSA measurements at the level between the malleoli and additionally at a second more proximal position (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AT length was measured as the distance from the most distal part of AT insertion to the calcaneus and the medial gastrocnemius myotendinous junction (MTJ) using a measuring tape. Structures were identified by use of US and metal fine wires and marked accurately on the skin as described in previous studies [14,15]. AT CSA was measured at 4 cm from most distal attachment on the calcaneus defined by use of a measuring tape [15].…”
Section: Tendon Structural Properties During Restmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structures were identified by use of US and metal fine wires and marked accurately on the skin as described in previous studies [14,15]. AT CSA was measured at 4 cm from most distal attachment on the calcaneus defined by use of a measuring tape [15]. The area of 4 cm falls well within the level of malleolus, and has been previously reported to be one of the most reliable site to measure [15].…”
Section: Tendon Structural Properties During Restmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation