2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonographic mound height as predictor of vesicoureteral reflux resolution after endoscopic treatment in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported predictors for success include a volcano-like mound appearance [16], mound height (as assessed by ultrasound) [17] and injection volume [18]. Moreover VUR grade [19] and timing of VUR are suspected predictors [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported predictors for success include a volcano-like mound appearance [16], mound height (as assessed by ultrasound) [17] and injection volume [18]. Moreover VUR grade [19] and timing of VUR are suspected predictors [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported predictors for success include a volcano-like mound appearance [ 17 ], mound height (as assessed by ultrasound) [ 18 ] and injection volume [ 19 ]. Moreover, VUR grade [ 20 ] and timing of VUR are suspected predictors [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zambaiti et al reported that PUM height was predictive of radiologic success with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 66%, respectively, using a height cut off of 9.8 mm. 27 Park et al graded the PUM (1-3) and found more pronounced and protruding PUMs to be more predictive of radiologic success. 28 More recently, the use of an intraoperative US-assisted approach for endoscopic VUR correction was investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%