2000
DOI: 10.1080/028418500127346081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonographic evaluation of bilateral groins in children with unilateral inguinal hernia

Abstract: US can be used routinely in the pre-operative diagnosis of inguinal hernia in children. PPV values higher than 4 mm, with a high accuracy indicate hernia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Criterion used for a positive test were the presence of abdominal structures, fluid in the patent processus, and/or a canal width >4mm in three[1214] studies, the presence of a lumen >2cm from the inferior epigastric vessels in one, [15] and not described in detail in one. [16] The pooled incidence of CPP among these studies was 32% (95% CI 18.7%–45.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Criterion used for a positive test were the presence of abdominal structures, fluid in the patent processus, and/or a canal width >4mm in three[1214] studies, the presence of a lumen >2cm from the inferior epigastric vessels in one, [15] and not described in detail in one. [16] The pooled incidence of CPP among these studies was 32% (95% CI 18.7%–45.8%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among cases suggested by US, CPP was confirmed at exploration in 78% (14/18)[16], 95% (74/78)[15] and 100% (10/10)[12]. The sensitivity of US in symptomatic and asymptomatic hernias from two studies was 98%[14] (323/330) and 97%[13] (458/473).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of bias regarding the flow and timing domain was also considered high as most studies limited the use of contralateral exploration as the reference standard to a preset part of their study population [5, 7, 11, 18–20, 22, 23]. Assessment of bias regarding the index test domain and overall applicability concerns were considered low (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In five studies, diagnostic accuracy test results could not be determined because no reference test was performed [5, 11, 22] or the diagnostic or reference test results could not be extracted, calculated or obtained from the authors [7, 23] (Table 3). Two studies were excluded because clinical follow-up was used as reference standard in all children, irrespective of the index test results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation