2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Anterolateral Ligament Injuries: Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pivot-Shift Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of concomitant anterolateral structure lesions in acute ACL injuries have been reported to vary from 40% to 90% depending on the chosen method of detection. [5,13,17].…”
Section: Biomechanics Of Lateralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of concomitant anterolateral structure lesions in acute ACL injuries have been reported to vary from 40% to 90% depending on the chosen method of detection. [5,13,17].…”
Section: Biomechanics Of Lateralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For US, the tibial portion of the ALL was better detected than the femoral and meniscal portions. Cavaignac et al 22 compared the diagnostic ability of ultrasonography and MRI to detect ALL injuries in 30 patients with an isolated ACL injury. They argued that, at US, the ALL was visible over its entire length in 100% of patients and it appeared injured in 63% of the cases; on MRI, the ALL was visible in 96% of patients, and it appeared injured in 53% of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6B). Some studies have shown that both a normal and injured ALL can be visualized on ultrasound, 58,59 although sonography currently is not widely used for evaluation.…”
Section: Anterolateral Ligament Normal Imaging Appearancesmentioning
confidence: 99%