2016
DOI: 10.1177/1098612x15602740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonographic, endoscopic and histological appearance of the caecum in clinically healthy cats

Abstract: Objectives The aim of the study was to describe the ultrasonographic and endoscopic appearance and characteristics of the caecum in asymptomatic cats, and to correlate these findings with histology. Methods Ex vivo ultrasonographic and histologic evaluations of a fresh caecum were initially performed. Then, 20 asymptomatic cats, privately owned or originating from a reproductive colony, were recruited. All cats had an ultrasonographic examination of the ileocaecocolic junction, where the thickness of the caeca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following parameters were recorded: the full thickness of the ileal, colonic and caecal walls on longitudinal planes of the wall in the near field; the appearance of wall layering; the thickness of the follicular layer in the proximal and distal caecum (combination of the mucosal and submucosal layers, with the proximal part being the closest to the colon and the distal part closest to the cul-de-sac) ( Figure 1); the content (gas, solid, liquid) of the caecum and the colon; the thickness, number, shape, echogenicity and homogeneity of the ileocolic LNs; the presence of peritoneal effusion; and the echogenicity of the mesenteric surrounding fat. 11 The last was qualified as follows, according to a grading scheme defined by the authors and used in a previous publication: grade 0 = normoechoic fat compared with adjacent mesenteric fat and well-defined contours of the LNs; grade 1 = hyper echoic fat and well-defined contours of the LNs; and grade 2 = hype rechoic fat and blurred contours of the LNs. 11 Normal ileal and colonic upper limit wall thicknesses used were 3.2 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Ultrasonographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The following parameters were recorded: the full thickness of the ileal, colonic and caecal walls on longitudinal planes of the wall in the near field; the appearance of wall layering; the thickness of the follicular layer in the proximal and distal caecum (combination of the mucosal and submucosal layers, with the proximal part being the closest to the colon and the distal part closest to the cul-de-sac) ( Figure 1); the content (gas, solid, liquid) of the caecum and the colon; the thickness, number, shape, echogenicity and homogeneity of the ileocolic LNs; the presence of peritoneal effusion; and the echogenicity of the mesenteric surrounding fat. 11 The last was qualified as follows, according to a grading scheme defined by the authors and used in a previous publication: grade 0 = normoechoic fat compared with adjacent mesenteric fat and well-defined contours of the LNs; grade 1 = hyper echoic fat and well-defined contours of the LNs; and grade 2 = hype rechoic fat and blurred contours of the LNs. 11 Normal ileal and colonic upper limit wall thicknesses used were 3.2 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively.…”
Section: Ultrasonographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 This dimpled aspect could be of variable intensity, usually mild to moderate in healthy cats, although a severe dimpled aspect could occasionally be found. 11 The aim of this study was to determine and describe the association between the ultrasonographic changes, the macroscopic appearance during colonoscopy, and the histological findings in cats presented with clinical signs suggestive of caecocolic disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations