1986
DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(86)90049-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic wave propagation and attenuation in wet bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
38
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) after solving the RUS inverse problem was about 5 %, which is comparable to the precision of the measurement and comparable to results reported previously for similar analyses on low damping materials (Seiner et al 2013). In contrast, bone viscoelasticity is difficult to characterize using ultrasound methods based on wave propagation, because these methods cannot usually separate two cumulative effects of energy losses: intrinsic viscoelastic losses and scattering effects (Lakes et al 1986;Haïat 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…(3) after solving the RUS inverse problem was about 5 %, which is comparable to the precision of the measurement and comparable to results reported previously for similar analyses on low damping materials (Seiner et al 2013). In contrast, bone viscoelasticity is difficult to characterize using ultrasound methods based on wave propagation, because these methods cannot usually separate two cumulative effects of energy losses: intrinsic viscoelastic losses and scattering effects (Lakes et al 1986;Haïat 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Ultrasound has successfully been used before to measure the elastic stiffness modulus of bone [13,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Ultrasonic measurement offers certain advantages in that it measures the elastic properties of the material; viscoelasticity and its associated time dependency is effectively removed due to the high frequencies involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonic techniques have been used extensively to explore the anisotropy of bone (Abendschein and Hyatt 1970;Lang 1970;Yoon and Katz 1976;Lees et al 1979), its composite microelastic character (Lakes et al 1983), its viscoelastic properties via wave attenuation (Lakes et al 1986), and its in-vivo properties (Brown and Mayor 1976;Lakes and Saha 1978;Andre et al 1980). Ultrasonic methods are attractive in that the material properties of bone can be obtained non-destructively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%