2019
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-1659-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic nebulization for the elemental analysis of microgram-level samples with offline aerosol mass spectrometry

Abstract: Abstract. The elemental composition of organic material in environmental samples – including atmospheric organic aerosol, dissolved organic matter, and other complex mixtures – provides insights into their sources and environmental processing. However, standard analytical techniques for measuring elemental ratios typically require large sample sizes (milligrams of material or more). Here we characterize a method for measuring elemental ratios in environmental samples, requiring only micrograms of material, usi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effective quantum yield is smaller than the one measured in Aiona et al, largely due to the differences in the measured MAC. Here, the sample was made using a slow-aging method and the mass of the material was estimated using the SVN with the AMS (SVN-AMS) . This gives absorption cross sections (Figure ) that are only a factor of 2–2.5 times larger than in Zhao et al but a factor of 20–25 times larger than those in Aiona et al and a factor of 80 times larger than in Harrison et al ,, Our results are likely similar to those of Zhao et al because that study also used slow-aging reactions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This effective quantum yield is smaller than the one measured in Aiona et al, largely due to the differences in the measured MAC. Here, the sample was made using a slow-aging method and the mass of the material was estimated using the SVN with the AMS (SVN-AMS) . This gives absorption cross sections (Figure ) that are only a factor of 2–2.5 times larger than in Zhao et al but a factor of 20–25 times larger than those in Aiona et al and a factor of 80 times larger than in Harrison et al ,, Our results are likely similar to those of Zhao et al because that study also used slow-aging reactions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Here, the SVN-AMS was used to estimate the organic mass and the factor of 2 difference may be due to an underestimation of the organic mass due to either the volatility of some components or a difference in relative ionization efficiency from the standard 1.4 used for ambient aerosol. 28,29 Alternatively, a slightly higher yield of chromophores may have been obtained here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the total OA concentration is not affected by the collection efficiency. All extracted aerosol species are expected to be internally mixed in the nebulized particles, so the offline AMS collection efficiency should be the same for all identified OA factors 91,92 .…”
Section: Ams-pmf Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%