Ultrasonic diagnosis of the diseases of liver and biliary tract

Tokano, Masayuki; Sanefuji, S.; Takada, S.; Takahashi, Ikuo; Kawashima, K.

doi:10.1007/bf02800026

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Diskussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

1975

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In 3,6% war keine Aussage möglich, in weiteren 3,6% war die Ultraschalldiagnose falsch, wobei in diese Zahl auch die diskrepanten Befunde einbezogen sind, hei denen keine operative Klärung möglich war. Diese hohe Treffsicherheit stinimt mit den Ergebnissen japanischer Autoren (8, [11][12][13] überein. Amerikanische Autoren berichteten dagegen über etwas schlechtere Ergebnisse nicht nur in bezug auf die Treffsicherheit, sondern auch auf die Darsteilbarkeit der Gallenblase (3-5).…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

Gallensteindiagnostik mit Ultraschall

Lutz¹,

Seidl²,

Petzoldt³

et al. 1975

Dtsch med Wochenschr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ultrasonic and radiological tests were compared in 267 patients suspected of having gall-stones. Radiological diagnosis was not possible in 20, because of lack of opacification, while in nine a gall-bladder was not demonstrable by ultrasound. In 226 the two tests coincided (positively or negatively), with 21 negative cholecystograms being interpreted as proof of stone. Seven of twelve discordant results were proven at operation: in three the ultrasonic, in four the radiological diagnosis was confirmed. Because of its accuracy, simplicity and absence of any risk ultrasonics is recommended as the first test to be performed if cholelithiasis is suspected.

show abstract

Section: Diskussionunclassified