2004
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.12.1407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic Detection of Middle Ear Effusion

Abstract: To assess the ability to detect and characterize middle ear effusion in children using A-mode ultrasonography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discolo et al recently evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound in detecting middle ear effusion in children and found it to be accurate and able to distinguish thin from mucoid fluid [19]. Chianese et al compared spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry to tympanometry in children aged 6-24 months and found it less accurate than tympanometry [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discolo et al recently evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound in detecting middle ear effusion in children and found it to be accurate and able to distinguish thin from mucoid fluid [19]. Chianese et al compared spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry to tympanometry in children aged 6-24 months and found it less accurate than tympanometry [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In continuation of our previous study, 9 this study aims to highlight the use of a computerized interpretation of the produced ultrasound waveform of the middle ear. This advances progress to create a non-invasive handheld ultrasound device that may assist the physician to interpret the middle ear contents with higher confidence and accuracy than tympanometry and pneumotoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8] Most recently Discolo et al 9 from our institution used a single propagating wave A-mode ultrasound in a preliminary group of patients. The waveforms produced were interpreted by a single human interpreter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tympanocentesis, the removal of a MEE by aspiration through a needle, can be performed to remove and directly examine a MEE[12], but it is rarely performed in most primary care clinics as it is considered an invasive procedure that carries additional risk to the patient. Ultrasound-based methods for assessing for the presence of a MEE have excellent accuracy [13], but lack the ability to spatially resolve middle ear biofilms, and typically require unobstructed water-based coupling through the outer ear canal. As a result, there is an unmet need for a technique in the clinician’s toolbox that can visually identify and quantitatively characterize a MEE, as well as assess the middle ear for infection noninvasively and in vivo .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%