2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3592056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic Characterization of Interfaces in Composite Bonds

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The inverse determination of imperfect interfaces from reflection spectra of normal and oblique incident ultrasonic waves in adhesive bonds of multidirectional composites is investigated. The oblique measurements are complicated by the highly dispersed nature of oblique wave spectra at frequencies above 3MHz. Different strategies for bond property reconstruction, including a modulation method, are discussed. The relation of measured interfacial spring density to the physico-chemical model of a compos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,19 In addition, the model allows the calculation of normal and transverse fiber-matrix interface stiffness moduli (also called the spring constant flux) K N and K T , respectively, that not only are related directly to the adhesive strength but also can be measured nondestructively using ABUS. [11][12][13][14] The theoretical calculations and experimental measurements of K T for moderate strength epoxies agree to within roughly 10-20 percent over the entire range of disbonds from nearly fully bonded to fully disbonded specimens, corresponding to a range of K T and of absolute bond strength of more than three orders of magnitude. [11][12][13][14][15] The very good agreement between the H-bond model and the experimental measurements for epoxy-bonded monolithic aluminum plates establishes the scientific underpinning for the quantitative nondestructive evaluation of the adhesive strength of such materials using ABUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…16,19 In addition, the model allows the calculation of normal and transverse fiber-matrix interface stiffness moduli (also called the spring constant flux) K N and K T , respectively, that not only are related directly to the adhesive strength but also can be measured nondestructively using ABUS. [11][12][13][14] The theoretical calculations and experimental measurements of K T for moderate strength epoxies agree to within roughly 10-20 percent over the entire range of disbonds from nearly fully bonded to fully disbonded specimens, corresponding to a range of K T and of absolute bond strength of more than three orders of magnitude. [11][12][13][14][15] The very good agreement between the H-bond model and the experimental measurements for epoxy-bonded monolithic aluminum plates establishes the scientific underpinning for the quantitative nondestructive evaluation of the adhesive strength of such materials using ABUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[11][12][13][14] The theoretical calculations and experimental measurements of K T for moderate strength epoxies agree to within roughly 10-20 percent over the entire range of disbonds from nearly fully bonded to fully disbonded specimens, corresponding to a range of K T and of absolute bond strength of more than three orders of magnitude. [11][12][13][14][15] The very good agreement between the H-bond model and the experimental measurements for epoxy-bonded monolithic aluminum plates establishes the scientific underpinning for the quantitative nondestructive evaluation of the adhesive strength of such materials using ABUS. We here extend the model, and potential application of ABUS or similar ultrasonic technique, to enable a nondestructive assessment of the contribution to the ILSS of carbon fiber-epoxy composites from chemical bonding at the fiber-matrix interfaces of the composite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many factors may lead to kissing bonds, including surface contaminates, adhesive chemistry, inappropriate curing stress, residual stress, moisture ingress, etc. As a result, kissing bonds can appear in a local fashion and the only way to detect them is to measure the local adhesive during fabrication and in service to track its degradation [5,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Kissing bonds are the most critical and challenging defect to be detected in bonded joints and significantly influence the confidence of bondline integrity after the joints are placed in service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%