2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5536-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic bone scalpel: utility in cervical corpectomy. A technical note

Abstract: Use of UBS is likely to provide a safe, rapid, and effective surgery when compared to conventional rongeurs and high-speed burr. The advantages such as lower blood loss and lower intra-operative incidental dural tears were noted with the use of UBS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Less bleeding increases visibility and decreases the time consumed. Also, this not being a rotatory instrument is safer [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Less bleeding increases visibility and decreases the time consumed. Also, this not being a rotatory instrument is safer [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, burr is the standard instrument used for anterior decompression through posterior-only approaches as described in the literature [10]. Also, sparse literature is available about the use of UBS for osteotomy procedures [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior investigations have reported on the safety of UBS in spinal surgery (23)(24)(25). Use of UBS in adult cervical spondylotic myelopathy, adult cervical corpectomy, and adolescent posterior instrumented fusion for idiopathic scoliosis have all been associated with lower blood loss (26)(27)(28). Other potential advantages include higher precision, lower rates of durotomies, and decreased operative times (22,26,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of UBS in adult cervical spondylotic myelopathy, adult cervical corpectomy, and adolescent posterior instrumented fusion for idiopathic scoliosis have all been associated with lower blood loss (26)(27)(28). Other potential advantages include higher precision, lower rates of durotomies, and decreased operative times (22,26,27). We feel these potential advantages of using an UBS in bone dissection distinguish it from manual osteotomes, which require malleting to achieve bone cuts and are non-hemostatic in their cutting action, and high-speed drills, which are less precise and can be associated with high temperatures if inadequate irrigation is used (29,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ultrasonic bone scalpel reduced blood loss while performing corpectomy [8]. Dave et al [19] performed cervical corpectomy using ultrasonic bone scalpel. After exposing the vertebral level to be removed and clearing the disc cartilage, UBS was used for removing the vertebra until the posterior cortex and remaining was removed using rongeur.…”
Section: Corpectomymentioning
confidence: 99%