2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0022029905001020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic analysis of rennet-induced pre-gelation and gelation processes in milk

Abstract: Dynamics of micro-structural changes in milk during the renneting process were analysed using high-resolution ultrasonic spectroscopy in combination with dynamic rheology and NIR transmission measurements. Two independent ultrasonic parameters, velocity and attenuation were measured in the frequency range 2 to 15 MHz, as a function of time after addition of rennet to milk. The results show an initial decrease of 20 nm for the average diameter of micelles caused by hydrolysis of the kappa-casein 'hairy' layer f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adapted with permission from Reference [80]. Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2005.…”
Section: Inset Effect Of Frequency On Ultrasonic Attenuation Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Adapted with permission from Reference [80]. Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2005.…”
Section: Inset Effect Of Frequency On Ultrasonic Attenuation Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 17 represents real-time ultrasonic monitoring of enzymatic removal of the 'hairy' layer of hydrated protein nanoparticles (casein micelles, 120 nm diameter approx. ), followed by particle aggregation and gelation in milk at 30 • C [80]. The κ-casein 'hairy' layer provides steric stability of the particle dispersion.…”
Section: Temperature Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The capability of this and other ultrasonic techniques were demonstrated for a variety of reactions catalysed by enzymes, namely, urease, -amylase and catalase (Kudryashov et. al, 2003), chymosin (Dwyer et al, 2005) proteinase K (Buckin & Craig, 2005), invertase (Resa et al, 2009), and cellobiase (Resa & Buckin, 2011) as well as other types of bioprocesses (McClements, 1995;Povey, 1997). It provided the detailed reaction extent and rate profiles in a broad range of concentrations, allowed analysis of the reverse reaction, determination of equilibrium constant and of the molar Gibbs free energy of reactions as well as analysis of reactions kinetic models (Resa & Buckin, 2011).…”
Section: Ultrasonic Monitoring Of Enzyme Reactions In Microemulsionsmentioning
confidence: 99%