2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasensitive monoclonal antibodies specific to thermal stable-soluble proteins of buckwheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the total soluble protein concentration of the processed fat and meat extracts by hot extraction was much higher than that of the extracts treated with cold extraction. The hot extraction may have increased the protein extraction efficiency because the fat and meat tissue are expanded by heat to form a space, and the extraction buffer penetrates this space to increase the contact area ( Kim et al, 2023 ). This result means that hot extraction is more effective than cold extraction for extracting TSSP to be analyzed from processed fat and meat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, the total soluble protein concentration of the processed fat and meat extracts by hot extraction was much higher than that of the extracts treated with cold extraction. The hot extraction may have increased the protein extraction efficiency because the fat and meat tissue are expanded by heat to form a space, and the extraction buffer penetrates this space to increase the contact area ( Kim et al, 2023 ). This result means that hot extraction is more effective than cold extraction for extracting TSSP to be analyzed from processed fat and meat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After performing the iELISA, absorbance was measured at 405 nm, and each condition showing the highest sensitivity was chosen as an optimal condition for the iELISA. Additionally, the test sample exhibiting an absorbance of 0.2 less, corresponding to the absorbance of the negative sample+5 SD of the absorbance of the negative sample, was judged to be negative in iELISA ( Kim et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the indirect ELISA analysis, a sample showing more than 0.2 OD value (OD value of 0% peanut sample + 5 × SD of the OD value of 0% peanut sample) was classified to be a positive sample [ 22 ]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) peroxidase conjugate diluted (1:10,000) was added with 100 μl each well and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After adding ABTS solution to develop color, the results of the indirect ELISA were measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader. The limit of detection (LOD) was obtained using the method described by Kim et al (2023) [22].…”
Section: Optimization Of Indirect Elisa For Peanut Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%