2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraschallkriterien zur Graduierung von Stenosen der A. carotis interna – Revision der DEGUM-Kriterien und Transfer in NASCET-Stenosierungsgrade

Abstract: Since 1986, German ultrasound criteria for grading carotid stenosis have followed the local diameter reduction percentage consistent with the definition used in the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) definition. To overcome the confusion caused by the coexisting grading method used in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), a German interdisciplinary council on carotid artery stenosis has recommended the implementation of the NASCET grading system (distal diameter reduction per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
15

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
53
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Lesions were defi ned as calcifi cation or inhomogeneous vessel wall deformation and an intima-media thickness (IMT) more than 1.1 mm. Stenoses of the carotid arteries were classifi ed according to revised DEGUM criteria [13]. Stenoses of the femoral arteries were subdivided considering the plaque characteristics, fl ow characteristics (appearance of laminar or non-laminar fl ow), peak systolic velocity and peak velocity ratio corresponding to clinical standards.…”
Section: Ultrasound Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesions were defi ned as calcifi cation or inhomogeneous vessel wall deformation and an intima-media thickness (IMT) more than 1.1 mm. Stenoses of the carotid arteries were classifi ed according to revised DEGUM criteria [13]. Stenoses of the femoral arteries were subdivided considering the plaque characteristics, fl ow characteristics (appearance of laminar or non-laminar fl ow), peak systolic velocity and peak velocity ratio corresponding to clinical standards.…”
Section: Ultrasound Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eingriffen erwarten die Arbeitskreise einen Vorteil durch eine NIRSÜberwachung, auch wenn hierfür zurzeit noch keine ausreichende Evidenz vorliegt Risikopatienten bzw. Risikoeingriffe für eine zerebrale Minderperfusion Patienten mit einem Zustand nach Apoplex und bestehenden neurologischen Defiziten Patienten mit einer mittelschweren (Grad 2) oder schweren (Grad 3) arteriellen Hypertonie -Entsprechend einem systolischen Blutdruck ≥160 mmHg[102] Patienten mit hochgradige(n) Karotisstenose(n) -D. h. ≥70%-Stenosegrad gemäß NASCET-Kriterien[103] …”
unclassified
“…PE imaging together with spectral Doppler), and most carotid artery surgery now takes place based on the ultrasound examination alone. The grading of the stenosis is based on the maximum velocities recorded in the arteries rather than the geometry recorded by PE imaging [1]. Although the technique works extremely well, velocity estimates are based on the assumption that blood flow is parallel to the artery wall, whereas in practice, flow patterns in the carotid artery can be very complex (see [2]), and it is possible that these measurements can be refined further in the future using vector velocity techniques such as those described in §4.3.…”
Section: Carotid Artery Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%