2016
DOI: 10.1515/jgth-2016-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraproducts of quasirandom groups with small cosocles

Abstract: AbstractATwo applications of our results are given, one in triangle patterns inside quasirandom groups and one in self-bohrifying groups. Our main tools are some variations of the covering number for groups, different kinds of length functions on groups, and the classification of finite simple groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 2, we shall establish the proof of Theorem 1.3, using mostly elementary arguments combined with the main results on ultraproducts of finite simple groups from [Yan16]. We can break it down into the following subsections:…”
Section: Outline Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Section 2, we shall establish the proof of Theorem 1.3, using mostly elementary arguments combined with the main results on ultraproducts of finite simple groups from [Yan16]. We can break it down into the following subsections:…”
Section: Outline Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Proposition 2.3, we know that we can find an ultrafilter U such that N U ⊆ M . But by [Yan16], G/N U is either isomorphic to S i for some i, or it cannot have any non-trivial finite dimensional unitary representation. But G/M is a finite quotient of G/N U , which must have a non-trivial finite dimensional unitary representation.…”
Section: Semisimple Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, an ultra‐quasirandom group might not be d‐quasirandom for some d1. In fact in , Yang provides an example of an ultra‐quasirandom group which is not even 2‐quasirandom. This example appears there as Example 1.7 and it is attributed to Pyber.…”
Section: Compactifications Of Ultraproductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To finish this section, we see that Pyber's example (see [, Example 1.7]) yields the existence of an ultraproduct of finite groups where the Bohr compactification and the universal internal compactification do not agree. Example Let p5 be a prime and let false(Gnfalse)ndouble-struckN be an infinite sequence of finite groups Gn satisfying the property that Gn is a perfect group with an element an which cannot be written as the product of n+1 commutator elements, and that the only simple quotient of Gn is normalPSL2false(Fpnfalse).…”
Section: Compactifications Of Ultraproductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In the special case of SO(3, R) Wis and L. C. Robertson [24] gave a transparent, nearly elementary proof). For more about vdW-groups see [50], [64], [74], and [94].…”
Section: Theorem 32 For Every Group G There Exists a Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%