2016
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201612312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraluminous X‐ray sources: Three exciting years

Abstract: The extreme extragalactic sources known as Ultraluminous X-ray Sources (ULX) represent a unique testing environment for compact objects population studies and the accretion process. Their nature has long been disputed. Their luminosity, well above the Eddington luminosity for a stellar-mass black hole, can imply the presence of an intermediate-mass black hole or a stellar black hole accreting above the Eddington limit. Both these interpretations are important to understand better the accretion process and the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we have illustrated the results of MAD simulations with the rather extreme values of a * = 0 and a * = 0.9: we find that the low-spin models are a better approximation to ULX behaviour, with a spectral turnover between 1 and 10 keV. MAD models with a * = 0.9 predict too much emission above 10 keV (regardless of accre-tion rate and inclination), an energy band where observed ULX spectra drop much more steeply (e.g., Bachetti 2016;Bachetti et al 2013;Rana et al 2015;Walton et al 2014Walton et al , 2013. Clearly, further work needs to be done to produce a grid of simulations over the full range of spins and mass accretion rates, but our first results are encouraging.…”
Section: X-ray Spectramentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In this work, we have illustrated the results of MAD simulations with the rather extreme values of a * = 0 and a * = 0.9: we find that the low-spin models are a better approximation to ULX behaviour, with a spectral turnover between 1 and 10 keV. MAD models with a * = 0.9 predict too much emission above 10 keV (regardless of accre-tion rate and inclination), an energy band where observed ULX spectra drop much more steeply (e.g., Bachetti 2016;Bachetti et al 2013;Rana et al 2015;Walton et al 2014Walton et al , 2013. Clearly, further work needs to be done to produce a grid of simulations over the full range of spins and mass accretion rates, but our first results are encouraging.…”
Section: X-ray Spectramentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The class of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULX) have Lx ∼ 10 39 − 10 42 erg s −1 (Swartz et al 2004), and it is thought that some of these are powered by pulsars, stellarmass black holes, and possibly intermediate-mass black holes for the most luminous of them (Mezcua et al 2013;Earnshaw et al 2016;Mezcua et al 2016;Bachetti 2016). The pulsars and stellar-mass black holes are associated with highmass star formation, and hence with molecular clouds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs) are X-ray sources with luminosity above the Eddington limit cannot be explained by the conventional idea of normal stellar mass black hole. Therefore, the basic nature of ultraluminous X-ray pulsars are [26,27], as of now, remains unsolved [28]. However, different models have been suggested for the ULX-pulsars including magnetic field of different strength, but none of them are conventional one.…”
Section: Arxiv:191109546v1 [Gr-qc] 20 Nov 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plot depicts the energy conditions for the inequalities Eqs (26)(27)(28)(29). as a function of the radial coordinate r. The curves for null energy condition (NEC), weak energy condition (WEC), strong energy condition (SEC), dominant energy condition (DEC) are shown in this figures, for the compact star Vela X-1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%