2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultralow percolation graphene/polyurethane acrylate nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, storage modulus at rubbery state does not change sensibly in presence of CNT‐HEMA. This observation is different from graphene filled APU nanocomposite reported by Liao et al who observed greater improvement of mechanical properties at rubbery state. They attributed such behavior to considerably lower elastic modulus of matrix at rubbery state, so the influence of graphene on the improvement of elastic modulus was more sensible compared with glassy state.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, storage modulus at rubbery state does not change sensibly in presence of CNT‐HEMA. This observation is different from graphene filled APU nanocomposite reported by Liao et al who observed greater improvement of mechanical properties at rubbery state. They attributed such behavior to considerably lower elastic modulus of matrix at rubbery state, so the influence of graphene on the improvement of elastic modulus was more sensible compared with glassy state.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement arises from the combination of two conducting fillers with unique geometric shapes and aspect ratios as well as different dispersion characteristics . It is well known that 0‐D CB and 2‐D GNPs are typical nanostructured carbon conductive fillers used in the polymer matrix . In this article, GNPs and CB were used to prepare the conductive polymer composites to show how would the fillers affect the conductivity of the composite if a small amount of GNPs is added into the CB composite and why the piezoresistive property of mixed better than CB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 It is well known that 0-D CB and 2-D GNPs are typical nanostructured carbon conductive fillers used in the polymer matrix. 22 In this article, GNPs and CB were used to prepare the conductive polymer composites to show how would the fillers affect the conductivity of the composite if a small amount of GNPs is added into the CB composite and why the piezoresistive property of mixed better than CB. The difference of conductivity and piezoresistive property between CB/SR and CB/GNPs/SR was investigated in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mori–Tanaka model has also been employed to estimate the ratio of graphene sheets basing on the above modulus results (Supporting Information Fig. ) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%