“…It is well known that the potentiometric titration method possesses the characteristics of higher accuracy and less influence of human factors than the acid–base titration method. , The above titration results measured by the acid–base titration method are further verified by the potentiometric titration method, which determines the end-point of titration by the sudden potential change of the indicatory electrode. As shown in Figure , the sudden potential changes appear when the consumptions of KOH solution are 0.25, 0.30, 0.14, and 0.26 mL for the titration solvents of methylbenzene, isopropanol, and water ( V methylbenzene / V isopropanol / V water = 100:99:1), isopropanol and water ( V isopropanol / V water = 99:1), absolute ethanol and water ( V absolute ethanol / V water = 99:1), and cyclohexane, isopropanol, and water ( V cyclohexane / V isopropanol / V water = 100:99:1), respectively, which are consistent with the acid–base titration results.…”