2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrahigh and selective adsorption of Au(III) by rich sulfur and nitrogen-bearing cellulose microspheres and their applications in gold recovery from gold slag leaching solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to more intuitively evaluate the economic feasibility of gold recovery from the CPU leaching solution, the production cost of PIDO membrane and the profit earned during gold recovery process are roughly calculated based on the price of the input raw materials, current gold price as well as the recovered gold amount using PIDO membrane. From the details supplied in Table S4, the cost of PIDO membrane is as low as $0.097/g, far less than those for other gold adsorbents reported in the literature 1,33,57–61 . More significantly, the generated gold income and profit/cost ratio for per gram PIDO membrane are $584.4 and 6024.8, respectively, prevailing over other gold adsorbents by an overwhelming majority 1,33,57–61 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In order to more intuitively evaluate the economic feasibility of gold recovery from the CPU leaching solution, the production cost of PIDO membrane and the profit earned during gold recovery process are roughly calculated based on the price of the input raw materials, current gold price as well as the recovered gold amount using PIDO membrane. From the details supplied in Table S4, the cost of PIDO membrane is as low as $0.097/g, far less than those for other gold adsorbents reported in the literature 1,33,57–61 . More significantly, the generated gold income and profit/cost ratio for per gram PIDO membrane are $584.4 and 6024.8, respectively, prevailing over other gold adsorbents by an overwhelming majority 1,33,57–61 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This was mainly due to the reduction reaction of Au( iii ) to Au(0) consuming the adsorption sites. 58…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was mainly due to the reduction reaction of Au(III) to Au(0) consuming the adsorption sites. 58 2.4.8 Gold capture from actual e-waste. To investigate the adsorption properties of MCSR-ATU using actual e-waste, a printed circuit board (PCB) was removed from a discarded mobile phone and subsequently placed into a solution to leach out the metals present.…”
Section: 47mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, among numerous techniques proposed, the adsorption strategy stands out because of its handiness and high efficiency. Such adsorbents as cellulose-based materials, 7,8 pseudomonas fluorescens cells 9 and silica-based materials 10 are applied to remove metal ions from water. Unfortunately, these adsorbents are generally formed in powder or granular, which is difficult to regenerate, therefore the treatment process is very awkward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%