2003
DOI: 10.1080/08958370304468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafine Particle Deposition in Humans During Rest and Exercise

Abstract: Ultrafine particles (diameter < 100 nm) may be important in the health effects of air pollution, in part because of their predicted high respiratory deposition. However, there are few measurements of ultrafine particle deposition during spontaneous breathing. The fractional deposition for the total respiratory tract of ultrafine carbon particles (count median diameter = 26 nm, geometric standard deviation = 1.6) was measured in 12 healthy subjects (6 female, 6 male) at rest (minute ventilation 9.0 +/- 1.3 L/mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
218
3
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
15
218
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultrafine particles had a predicted deposition fraction of 0.39 and the fine particles had a predicted deposition fraction of 0.47. Our ultrafine particle deposition fraction results were considerably higher than the predicted values (0.75 actual vs. 0.39 predicted), as we have seen to a lesser extent in our previous studies (25). Our fine particle number deposition fraction agreed better with the model (actual 0.34 vs. predicted 0.47), but the mass deposition fraction was undetermined in the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ultrafine particles had a predicted deposition fraction of 0.39 and the fine particles had a predicted deposition fraction of 0.47. Our ultrafine particle deposition fraction results were considerably higher than the predicted values (0.75 actual vs. 0.39 predicted), as we have seen to a lesser extent in our previous studies (25). Our fine particle number deposition fraction agreed better with the model (actual 0.34 vs. predicted 0.47), but the mass deposition fraction was undetermined in the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In a further study of breathing 25 g/m 3 ultrafine carbon particles during exercise, exposure was associated with reduced blood monocyte expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in a concentration-related manner, evidence for transient reductions in parasympathetic influence on heart rate variability, a reduction in repolarization (QT) interval, and a small reduction in blood monocytes and activation of T lymphocytes in healthy women (25)(26)(27). However, no change in induced sputum cells was seen at 25 or 50 g/m 3 of ultrafine carbon particles (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased pulmonary ventilation with physical activity leads to increased inhalation of air and therefore greater inhaled concentration (and potential dose) of TRAP (18). However, despite this possible increased dose, our findings suggest that physical activity may also offset the impact of TRAP on parasympathetic modulation of the heart at higher exposure levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Despite overall similar average concentrations, it is possible that the PM characteristics may differ between the bedroom and living areas. Furthermore, the main living area may represent the location where subjects are awake and active, therefore having higher minute ventilation and increased particle deposition (32), and subsequently increased susceptibility to adverse effects of pollutant exposure. We found no link between pollutant concentrations and changes in lung function, similar to results of previous studies showing no clear association between indoor PM and lung function in few patients with COPD (27,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%