2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.205428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafast structural relaxation dynamics of laser-excited graphene: Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations including electron-phonon interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe a nonexponential, slow relaxation with characteristic times of the order of tens or hundreds of picoseconds for the particular geometry examined here, depending on the specific combination of TMDs in the heterostructure, varying also with the number of layers and the sharpness of the heterostructure interface. Similar nonexponential energy relaxations have been reported in the relaxation of laser-excited graphene, 55 in low-dimensional (1D and 2D) nonlinear systems due to excitations of intrinsic localized modes (breathers), 56−58 while they are also typically emerging in various glassy materials. 59−61 ■ METHODS Model System.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We observe a nonexponential, slow relaxation with characteristic times of the order of tens or hundreds of picoseconds for the particular geometry examined here, depending on the specific combination of TMDs in the heterostructure, varying also with the number of layers and the sharpness of the heterostructure interface. Similar nonexponential energy relaxations have been reported in the relaxation of laser-excited graphene, 55 in low-dimensional (1D and 2D) nonlinear systems due to excitations of intrinsic localized modes (breathers), 56−58 while they are also typically emerging in various glassy materials. 59−61 ■ METHODS Model System.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…42 were obtained for distorted graphene, which is probably one of the reasons for a significantly higher value of the predicted coupling parameter. They are We note that the electron-phonon coupling parameter calculated by Krylow et al 43 raises with the increase in the electron temperature significantly faster than that predicted by XTANT. The reason for this is that Krylow et al 43 used Eliashberg formalism for the coupling calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…2.Electron-ion (electron-phonon) coupling parameter calculated by XTANT10 in a single layer of free-standing graphene monolayer. Top panel: twodimensional coupling parameter, compared with the estimates by Laitinen et al,41 by Pomarico et al,42 and by Krylow et al43 Bottom panel: three-dimensional coupling normalized per thickness of the single layer assumed to be 3.35 Å. also higher than those predicted by other simulations from Refs. 41 and 43.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Our results are in a good agreement with refs 14, 15, and 32 and especially with ref 33, where the attosecond core-level spectroscopy demonstrated that the Raman-inactive A 1 ′ mode is the dominating channel for dissipation of electronic coherence due to stronger coupling to electrons. 50 Note also that in our calculations the acoustic sum rule is not fully fulfilled because we inhibit the long-wavelength dipole-allowed transitions 51,52 by filling the states above the Fermi energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%