2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.02.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafast electron diffraction at surfaces after laser excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In previous studies, we investigated the thermal response of a 5.5 nm thin Bi film by means of ultrafast electron diffraction. 22,23 We found good agreement between the measured thermal boundary conductance and the value obtained by using the phonon transmission probability calculated in the two above described models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 In previous studies, we investigated the thermal response of a 5.5 nm thin Bi film by means of ultrafast electron diffraction. 22,23 We found good agreement between the measured thermal boundary conductance and the value obtained by using the phonon transmission probability calculated in the two above described models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…22,23,25 Briefly, a short electron pulse is diffracted at a surface for different delays from an initial short laser pulse excitation. Because of the Debye-Waller effect, the diffraction spot intensity is affected by the surface temperature, which is used to extract the transient temperature evolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 For example, a high density of interfaces can reduce the effective thermal conductivity of materials below the amorphous limit 5,6 and therefore may find applications in improving thermoelectric energy conversion. 7 The acoustic mismatch model (AMM) and diffuse mismatch model (DMM) are often used to predict and interpret the interface thermal conductance G. 8,9 These models assume that G is a consequence of only the lattice dynamics of the bulk materials on each side of the interface; changes in the bonding and vibrational density of states of atoms adjacent to the interface are not explicitly accounted for in these models. In the AMM, the phonon transmission at the interface is derived from differences in acoustic impedances, i.e., products of the mass density and speeds of sound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct observation of atomic motion in nanostructures with low atomic number, such as carbon, has not yet been achieved. Electron diffraction, with its five orders of magnitude enhanced scattering cross-section and advanced schemes achieving femtosecond temporal resolution [11,12,13,14], offers a new window into the realm of photo-excited structural dynamics, with sensitivity down to < ∼ 1 nm [11,14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%